期刊文献+

LPG罐车泄漏爆炸事故验证及影响因素数值模拟 被引量:7

Numerical Simulation of Validation and Influence Factors of Explosion Accident Caused from LPG Tank Leakage
下载PDF
导出
摘要 液化石油气(LPG)是常见的易燃易爆化学品,采用PHAST程序中的UDM模型验证数值模拟的可行性,以控制变量法研究同一泄漏孔径下温度、环境和泄漏口方向对事故后果的影响规律.结果表明,随着温度升高,LPG泄漏扩散距离变远、闪火影响区域扩大,但喷射火辐射量随之降低,特别是在150~200 m距离时衰减明显;表面粗糙度值越低,LPG泄漏扩散越远,爆炸冲击波传播的较远,但表面粗糙度对喷射火热辐射强度影响较小;泄漏口方向对事故的影响较大,泄漏口水平方向的泄漏距离最远,泄漏口方向垂直向下时,容易形成液池,泄漏口向上时,扩散距离以及闪火和喷射火的影响范围最小. The safety problem of liquefied petroleum gas(LPG)is significantly important since it is a frequently used chemical substance prone to ignition and explosion.The explosion case of LPG tanker in Linyi,Shandong,was investigated by the UDM model in PHAST software under the method of parameter controlling.The results show that the direction of leaking affects the explosion scenario remarkably.When it is upward or downward,the leaking and jet radiations have a minimum or maximum effect area,respectively,while horizontal,a liquid pool would be formed.With the increase of ambient temperature,the leaking and expansion distances and the influence area of flash fires increase while the jet flame radiation decreases,especially within the distance of 150~200 m.The surface-roughness affects little to the jet radiation intensity while the explosion shock wave shows a revered relation with it.
作者 孙宝平 张海英 吕淑然 陈文瑛 SUN Baoping;ZHANG Haiying;Lü Shuran;CHEN Wenying(School of Management and Engineering,Capital University of Economics and Business,Beijing 100070,China;China Nuclear Power Engineering Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100822,China)
出处 《北京理工大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第2期137-142,共6页 Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology
基金 北京市教育委员会科学技术研究计划项目(KM202010038002)。
关键词 LPG罐车 泄漏 PHAST程序 影响范围 LPG tank leakage PHAST influence range
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献18

  • 1宇德明,冯长根,曾庆轩,郭薪亚.热辐射的破坏准则和池火灾的破坏半径[J].中国安全科学学报,1996,6(2):5-10. 被引量:63
  • 2劳动部职业安全卫生与锅炉压力容器监察局编著.国内外劳动安全卫生典型重大伤亡事故案例[M].北京:中国检察出版社,1994:1371-1576.
  • 3Britter R.E,McQuaidJ.Workbook on the dispersion of dense gases[J].HSE Contract Research Report No.17/1988,Sheffield,U.K.1988:129-134.
  • 4Ermak D L,Chan ST,Morganetal D L.A Comparison of Dense Dispersion Model Simulations with Burro Series LNG Spill Test Results[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,1982,6:129-160.
  • 5Van Ulden A.P.On the spreading of a heavy gas released near the ground.In:Buschmann C.H,eds.Proceedings of 1st Int.Syrup.on Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries,1974:221-226.
  • 6DNV Software UDM Theory Document[Z].
  • 7Daniel ACrowh Joseph FLouvar.Chemical process safety fundamentals with application[M].New Jersey:Prentice-Hall,1990:121-151.
  • 8郭少为,吴文权.建筑物对空气污染物扩散影响的研究[J].城市环境与城市生态,1997,10(1):54-57. 被引量:11
  • 9杨年华,张志毅.隧道爆破振动控制技术研究[J].铁道工程学报,2010,27(1):82-86. 被引量:87
  • 10孙西濛,高文学,李志星,邓洪亮,叶春琳,魏鹏巍.浅埋偏压隧道开挖爆破振动与控制技术[J].施工技术,2011,40(2):51-53. 被引量:26

共引文献46

同被引文献58

引证文献7

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部