摘要
教育部、科技部印发《关于规范高等学校SCI论文相关指标使用树立正确评价导向的若干意见》,要求规范各类评价工作中SCI论文相关指标的使用,鼓励定性与定量相结合的综合评价方式,探索建立科学的评价体系。目前我国学术评价体系体现出三个突出问题:第一,SCI至上;第二,缺乏分类评价体系;第三,同行评价活动不完善。本文对我国目前学术评价体系的现状和问题作了分析,对比了文献计量、替代计量(Altmetrics)和同行评议等学术评价方法的优劣,同时对国外学术评价体系作了分析,最后提出了完善我国学术评价体系的设想。从评价体系上可以借鉴英国的REF(Research Excellence Framework,科研卓越框架),同时引入替代计量作为文献计量的补充,引入区块链的技术,解决同行评议活动中可能的主观性和道德风险问题。
The Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Science and Technology issued the opinions on standardizing the use of relevant indicators of SCI papers in colleges and universities and establishing correct evaluation guidance.The initial opinion requires standardizing the use of relevant indicators of SCI papers in various evaluation work,encouraging the comprehensive evaluation method of combining qualitative and quantitative methods,and exploring the establishment of a scientific evaluation system.At present,there are three problems in Chinas academic evaluation system:over-rated SCI,lack of classified evaluation system and imperfect peer evaluation.This paper analyzes the current situation and problems of Chinas academic evaluation system,compares the advantages and disadvantages of academic evaluation methods such as literature measurement,altmetrics and peer review,discusses the academic evaluation system abroad,and finally puts forward some ideas to improve the academic evaluation system in China.In terms of evaluation system,we can learn from the UKs REF(Research Excellence Framework),and introduce alternative measurement as a supplement to literature measurement,and use blockchain technology to solve possible subjectivity and moral hazard problems in peer review and evaluation activities.
作者
苗建军
王擎
张彤
Jianjun Miao;Qing Wang;Tong Zhang(Department of Economics,Boston University;Institute of Chinese Financial Studies,Southwestern University of Finance and Economics)
出处
《经济学报》
CSSCI
2020年第4期214-226,共13页
China Journal of Economics
