摘要
文章采用量化比较的方法,从小说与故事、叙述与对话两个维度,研究助词“了”与“着”,“了1”与“了2”在频率、频率变化和相关性方面的差异,从而证明:叙事语料应区分叙述与对话,后者并非叙事性的;同为叙事语篇,小说不如故事典型、匀质。
This article adopts the method of quantitative comparison to study the difference in frequency,frequency change and correlation between the auxiliary words"le(了)"and"zhe(着)","le1"and"le2"from the two dimensions of novel and story,narration and dialogue.This proves that the narrative corpus should distinguish between narration and dialogue,the latter is not narrative;both are narrative texts,and the novel is not as typical and homogeneous as the story.
作者
郭昭军
GUO Zhao-jun(School of Literature,Nankai University,Tianjin 300071,China)
出处
《通化师范学院学报》
2021年第3期59-63,共5页
Journal of Tonghua Normal University
基金
天津市社科项目“特征测量方法在语体研究中的运用”(TJYY20-006)。
关键词
语体
对话
叙述
频率
相关性
style
dialogue
narration
frequency
relevance
