摘要
智能机器范式发生了从他主到自主的转型,智能机器的权利需求成为前瞻性思考和预测的对象。在技术控制论逻辑下,智能机器自主性被解释为人类智能的延伸;在技术失控论逻辑下,智能机器自主性被解释为人工智能的创造性。在智能机器自主性不同解释路径下,关于偏离行为的认识有所差别,影响法律责任归属的认定。需要考虑规则设计的前瞻性、保守性、可行性、阶段性及限度等因素,在区分智能机器主体属性和工具属性的基础上,对智能机器自主性进行法律规制。
As the paradigm of intelligent machines has changed from independent to autonomous,the demand for rights of intelligent machines has become the object of forward-looking thinking and prediction.Under the logic of technology under control,the autonomy of intelligent machines is interpreted as extension of human intelligence;under the logic of technology out of control,the autonomy of intelligent machines is interpreted as creativity of artificial intelligence;under different interpretation paths of autonomy,the cognition of deviation behavior is different,which affects the distribution of legal responsibility.It is necessary to consider the forward-looking and conservative,feasibility and limitation,and stage of rule design.On the basis of distinguishing the subject attribute and tool attribute of intelligent machines,the autonomy of intelligent machines should be regulated by law.
作者
董彪
DONG Biao(Law School,Beijing Technology and Business University,Beijing 102488,China)
出处
《太原理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2021年第2期1-7,20,共8页
Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金
教育部人文社会科学基金青年项目"人工智能时代新型民事法律责任规则研究"(18YJC820014)。
关键词
智能机器
自主性
解释路径
主体属性
工具属性
intelligent machine
autonomy
interpretation path
subject attribute
tool attribute
