摘要
伴随着区块链技术的社会整合进程,以智能合约为载体的新型共犯样本呈现出异化形态,对此传统共犯归责模式面临"去中心"环境下网络平台的监管弱化、"假名主义"环境下交互主体的参与虚化、合约主体意思联络"单向一次性"的归责困境,需在尊重数字逻辑的前提下联动调整共犯归责逻辑,以实现智能合约共犯归责范阈的外限界定与内限梳清。在外部界限层面,需将合约自执行程序规范还原为因果共犯论逻辑,并等置转换为合法则的条件公式,从而于入罪向度上实现虚拟参与行为与现实法益侵害之间因果流程的具体判定;在内部界限层面,需对中立性的智能合约运维平台进行类型划分并匹配构建内涵"事前基于自主发现产生的验证、报告"与"事后基于被动通知产生的断网、消除"注意义务体系,同时对合约主体的共犯归责在客观层面、主观层面分别引入行为共同理论与"符号语言"意思联络理论,从而于出罪向度上实现合约共犯参与类型的梳清与处罚范阈的缩限。
Along with the social integration process of Block chain Technology,the samples of new accomplice taking smart contracts as carrier presents alienation forms,to which the traditional accomplice imputation model faces the weakened supervision of the network platform in the"decentralized"environment,the virtual participation of the interactive subject under the’pseudonyms’environment,and the’one-way one-time’imputation dilemma of the contract subject.It is necessary to adjust jointly the accomplice imputation logic under the premise of respecting digital logic,so as to realize the external and internal limits of the liability threshold of intelligent contract accomplice.At the level of external boundary,it is necessary to restore the specification of contract self-execution procedure to the logic of causal accomplice,and convert it into the conditional formula of legal principle,so as to realize the specific judgment of causal process between virtual participation behavior and real legal interest infringement from the perspective of criminalization.At the internal boundary level,the types of neutral smart contract operation and maintenance platforms need to be classified and matched to build a duty of system with the connotation of"verification and report based on independent discovery beforehand"and"network disconnection and elimination based on passive notification afterwards".At the same time,from the objective and subjective perspectives,the theory of common behavior and the theory of’symbolic language’are introduced to the imputation of accomplices of contract subjects,so as to realize the clarification of the types of participation of contractual accomplices and the limitation of the penalty threshold in the dimension of crime.
作者
王霖
WANG Lin(School of Law,Guizhou Finance and Economics University,Guiyang,Guizhou 550025)
出处
《长白学刊》
北大核心
2021年第3期80-89,共10页
Changbai Journal
基金
司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目“区块链新型犯罪的刑事风险防控研究”(20SFB4032)。
关键词
智能合约
自执行逻辑
合法则条件公式
行为共同说
符号语言的意思联络
Smart Contracts
Self Executing Logic
Conditional Formula of Legal Principle
the Common Behavior Theory
the Symbolic Language Communication Theory
