摘要
337调查制度是现阶段美国针对知识产权的边境保护所采取的一项措施。从337调查制度的发展来看,其经历了几个阶段的修改后已经成为一项具备完整体系的制度。随着WTO相关机制的建立和完善,近年来美国针对337调查制度做出了一定程度上的修订,但并未改变337调查制度的本质。本文从美国337条款实践和立法修订后最新发展趋势剖析入手,通过对国民待遇原则的法理分析及认定标准探讨,对比分析337调查和美国知识产权司法诉讼得出美国337调查构成对WTO国民待遇原则之违反的结论。文章最后探讨在WTO争端解决机制下挑战其违规性的路径选择和具体策略。
The Section 337 investigation is a measure taken by the United States for border protection of intellectual property rights at this stage.From the perspective of the development of the Section 337 investigation system,it has gone through several stages of revision and has become a complete system.With the establishment and improvement of WTO related mechanisms,the United States has made certain revisions to the Section 337 investigation system in recent years,but the nature of it has not changed.This article starts with the analysis of the latest development trends in the practice of Section 337 and the revision of the legislation,by analyzing the national treatment principle and discussing the identification standards,and comparing the Section 337 investigation and the US intellectual property judicial litigation,we can conclude that the Section 337 investigation constitutes the violation of WTO National Treatment Principle.The article finally discusses the path and specific strategies to challenge its violations under the WTO dispute settlement mechanism.
出处
《电子知识产权》
2021年第4期57-63,共7页
Electronics Intellectual Property
关键词
337调查
国民待遇原则
WTO争端解决机制
Section 337 Investigation
National Treatment Principle
WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism
