摘要
为观察不同时间段下,不同临床微生物标本检验的阳性率差异,本文回顾性分析本单位2018年1月~2019年12月间3 000例微生物标本检测报告,依照时段进行分组,其中2018年1月~2018年12月1500例微生物标本检测报告纳入对照组,2019年1月~2019年12月1 500例微生物标本检测报告纳入实验组,对比两时期临床微生物标本检验的阳性率差异。结果显示,实验组血培养标本(4.86%)、伤口分泌物及穿刺标本(15.13%)、大便及尿液标本(3.70%)、呼吸道标本的检验阳性率(23.75%)均低于对照组(13.81%、26.82%、12.14%、37.03%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。可见临床不同时段的微生物标本检验阳性率存在差异,相关岗位医务人员需要提起足够重视,事关疾病诊治与临床合理用药工作的开展,值得关注。
To observe the differences in the positive rates of different clinical microbiology specimen tests under different periods.The 3000 microbiology specimen testing reports in the unit from January 2018 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed and grouped according to periods,of which 1500 reports from January 2018 to December 2018 were included in the control group,and 1500 reports from January 2019 to December 2019 were included in the experimental group.The differences in the positivity rates of clinical microbiology specimen tests between the two periods were compared.The positive rates of blood culture specimen test(4.86%),wound secretion and puncture specimen test(15.13%),stool and urine specimen test(3.70%),and respiratory tract specimen test(23.75%)in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group(13.81%,26.82%,12.14%,and 37.03%),and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There are differences in the positive rate of microbiology specimen tests in different clinical periods,and medical personnel in relevant positions need to pay sufficient attention to this,which is related to the development of disease diagnosis and treatment and the rational use of clinical drugs,and deserves attention.
作者
尹青霞
Yin Qingxia(Department of Laboratory Medicine,Henglan Hospital,Zhongshan City,Guangdong Province,Zhongshan,Guangdong,528478,China)
出处
《质量安全与检验检测》
2021年第1期119-121,共3页
QUALITY SAFETY INSPECTION AND TESTING
关键词
微生物
标本
检验
阳性率
Microbiology
Specimen
Test
Positive Rate
