期刊文献+

全球药方还是特洛伊木马?PISA的教育政策效应批判——一份基于教育政策社会学视角的文献报告 被引量:10

Global Prescription or Trojan Horse?Criticisms on the Policy Effect of PISA——A Literature Report
原文传递
导出
摘要 PISA是经合组织参与全球治理的重要政策工具。它的产生与教育治理领域中的新自由主义、数目化管理及比较转向息息相关,在一定程度上引发了全球教育政策的"趋同"现象,并在不同国家与地区发挥着"教育政策改革指引"或"教育政策或立场背书"的作用,其影响的范围和程度则由各国具体的PISA成绩、文化传统、地缘政治地位、国内政治环境等决定。PISA业已成为全球教育政策领域的基石,其在各国引发的政策回应在超国家层面涉及经合组织的能力与跨国的教育政策趋同压力,在国家层面涉及"外部化压力"和"模范社会"的示范作用,在国家内部则涉及国内行动者网络与信息"转译"的过程。梅耶、布迪厄、福柯等社会学家的经典理论为理解PISA与全球教育治理结构及个体行动者的关系提供了理论资源。针对PISA的研究需注意方法论民族主义和实在论转向,重拾经典议程和知识传统,注意批判。 PISA is an important policy tool for OECD to participate global governance. Its emergence is related to the rising of the neoliberalism, governance by numbers and comparative turn in the field of education governance. It, to some extent, has triggered the phenomenon of "convergence" of global education policy, and plays the role of "educational policy reform guidelines" or "educational policy endorsement" in different countries. The scope and extent of its impact are determined by a nation’s PISA achievements, cultural traditions, geopolitical status, domestic political environment and so on. PISA has become the cornerstone of the global field of education policy. The policy responses by various nation-states it triggers depend on such factors at supranational level as the capacity of OECD and the pressures experienced by nation-state in borrowing education policies. At the national level, the policy responses it triggers are influenced by such factors as the "externalized pressures" and "model societies". At the subnational level, the networks of domestic actors play important role. The classical theories of sociologists such as Meyer, Bourdieu and Foucault provide theoretical resources for understanding the relationship between PISA and the global educational governance structure and individual actors. For further study of PISA, we should pay attention to the criticism of methodology nationalism and realism, to re-pick up the classical agenda and knowledge tradition, pay attention to critical studies.
作者 谢爱磊 李家新 黄咏欣 XIE Ailei;LI Jiaxin;HUANG Yongxin(Bay Area Education Policy Institute for Social Development,Guangzhou University,Guangzhou,510006,China;School of Education,Guangzhou University,Guangzhou,510006,China)
出处 《全球教育展望》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第2期55-79,共25页 Global Education
基金 广州市教育局高校科研项目羊城学者项目(项目编号:202032861) 广东省哲学社会科学规划项目(项目编号:GD19CJY10) 广东省哲学社会科学规划青年项目(项目编号:GD19YJY02)。
关键词 PISA 教育政策社会学 全球教育治理 PISA sociology of educational policy global educational governance
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献52

  • 1林志华 孟鸿伟.当今世界教育热点追踪[N].中国教育报,2002-05-25.
  • 2http://www.pisa.oecd.org/pisa
  • 3http://www.fed.cuhk.edu.hk/hkpisa
  • 4[英]诺曼·朗沃斯.终身学习在行动——21世纪的教育变革[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006.
  • 5联合国教科文组织.为了21世纪的教育——问题与展望[M].王晓辉,赵中建等,译.北京:教育科学出版社,2002:43-44.
  • 6Assessing Scientific. Reading and Mathematical Literacy: A Framework for PISA 2006 [EB/OL].OECD Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. http://www.oecd.org.
  • 7Andreas Schleicher. Measuring Student Knowledge and Skills :A New Framework for Assessment[ M ]. Paris: OECD, 1999.7.
  • 8OECD. Participating Countries/Economies [EB/OL ]. http: //www.oecd.org/pisa/, 2013-05-17.
  • 9OECD. Who' s Who in PISA [ EB/OL ]. http ://www.oecd.org/ pisa/, 2013-05-17.
  • 10Programme for International Student Assessment [EB/OL]. http ://www.pisa.gc.ca/, 2015-05-17.

共引文献66

引证文献10

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部