期刊文献+

互联网平台垄断行为的特征、成因与监管策略 被引量:73

The Characteristics,Causes and Regulatory Strategies of Internet Platforms’Monopoly Behavior
下载PDF
导出
摘要 互联网平台的兴起给经济发展带来了深远的影响,现有监管体系亟须作出适当调整以保障平台经济的健康发展。与传统行业相比,互联网平台的垄断行为具有跨界滥用平台支配地位和滥用相对数据优势等新特征。平台势力和垄断行为的背后有着复杂的形成机理,可以从互联网平台经济学特征、商业模式、平台双重身份、平台经济整体发展阶段等多个方面来进行剖析,厘清这些特殊成因有助于提升监管的针对性和有效性。对于互联网平台的垄断行为,需要有新的监管原则和监管视角,强调行为后果分析与差异化分析,加强多部门协同监管,严格限制大平台无序扩张。 The rise of internet platform has brought the profound influence to the social and economic activities.The current regulation system has to be modified properly to support the healthy development of the platform economy.Compared to the traditional industries,the monopoly of the internet platform has its own features such as the cross-market abuse of platform dominance and abuse of comparative data advantages.There are complex formation mechanism of the platform market power and monopoly,which could be scrutinized from economic features,business model,the dual identity of platform,and the overall competition stage.The clear and proper understanding of the special origin of the internet platform monopoly could be helpful for the accuracy and effectiveness of the platform regulation.The new regulation principle and perspective is necessary for the platform regulation,such as emphasizing on behavior outcome analysis and differentiation analysis,strengthening the multi-agency coordination,and strict regulation of the disorderly expansion of dominant platform.
作者 曲创 王夕琛 QU Chuang;WANG Xi-chen
出处 《改革》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第5期53-63,共11页 Reform
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“数字化变革、中国流通渠道创新和经济增长模式转变研究”(20&ZD054)。
关键词 互联网平台 平台支配地位 平台反垄断 internet platform platform dominance platform antitrust
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献42

  • 1董维刚,张昕竹.银行卡产业特征与反垄断难题[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2007,24(6):111-119. 被引量:18
  • 2Gale, B. T. Market Share and Rate of Return [J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1972,54 (4):412- 423.
  • 3Kaplow, L. Market Definition, Market Power[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2015,(43):148- 161.
  • 4Stigler, G. J. Notes on the Theory of Duopoly[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1940,48(4): 521-541.
  • 5Baumol, W. J., J. C. Panzar, and R. D. Willig. Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure : Reply[J]. American Economic Review, 1983,73 (3) :491-496.
  • 6Rochet, J., and J. Tirole. Platform Competition in Two-sided Markets [J]. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2003, (4) :990-1029.
  • 7Evans, D. S., and R. Schmalensee. The Industrial Organization of Markets with Two-sided Platforms[J]. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2005,3 ( 1 ) : 103-114.
  • 8Evans, D. S., and M. Noel. Defining Antitrust Markets When Firms Operate Two-sided Platforms [J]. Columbia Business Law Review, 2005,(3):667-720.
  • 9Th@ot, F. Market Power in Online Search and Social-networking: A Matter of Two-sided Markets [J]. World Competition, Kluwer Law International, 2013,36(2) : 195-221.
  • 10Gandal, N. The Dynamics of Competition in the Intemet Search Engine Market [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2001,19(7) : 1103-1117.

共引文献500

同被引文献971

引证文献73

二级引证文献404

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部