期刊文献+

泌尿系CT定量分析对输尿管结石嵌顿的预测价值 被引量:8

Predictive value of urinary CT quantitative analysis for incarceration of ureteral calculi
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价泌尿系CT定量分析对输尿管结石治疗后出理嵌顿的预测价值。方法将2018年1月至2018年12月于广西中医药大学第一附属医院行结石清除术治疗的120例输尿管结石患者进行回顾性研究,结石清除治疗后出现输尿管结石嵌顿的患者为嵌顿组(49例),未出现的为对照组(71例),对两组患者的年龄、性别等一般资料及患者接受结石清除治疗前的结石大小、体积,肾积水程度及CT值进行比较,并应用Logistic回归分析对影响治疗后输尿管结石嵌顿的因素进行分析,应用受试者工作曲线(ROC曲线)对相关危险因素预测治疗后输尿管结石嵌顿的诊断价值及诊断效能进行分析。结果两组患者的年龄、性别等一般资料及治疗前结石的数量、位置及部位相比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);而嵌顿组患者的结石长径、CT值及肾积水发生率均明显高于对照组(P<0.05);Logistic回归示结石长径、结石CT值及肾积水是治疗后输尿管结石嵌顿的独立危险因素(OR=1.365,1.011,1.049;P=0.005,<0.001,0.041);ROC曲线显示,CT值联合结石长径诊断治疗后输尿管结石嵌顿方面具有较高的诊断效能(AUC=0.903),明显高于CT值、结石长径、肾积水的单一诊断(Z=2.036,2.790,5.355;均P<0.05),此时敏感性为89.80%,特异性为76.06%。结论泌尿系CT定量分析能有效对治疗后输尿管结石嵌顿进行预测,且结石的CT值联合结石长径在预测治疗后输尿管结石嵌顿方面具有较高的敏感性及特异性。 Objective To evaluate the predictive value of urinary CT quantitative analysis for incarceration of ureteral calculi after treatment.Methods A total of 120 patients with ureteral calculi who underwent calculus removal in our hospital from January 2018 to December 2018 were enrolled.Patients with ureteral calculi incarcerated after calculus removal were incarcerated(49 patients),the control group appeared(71 cases),comparing the age and gender of the two groups and the stone size,volume,hydronephrosis and CT value before the patient received the stone removal treatment,and applying logistic regression analysis.The factors affecting the incarceration of ureteral calculi after treatment were analyzed,and the receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC curve)was used to analyze the diagnostic value and diagnostic efficacy of vascular catheter incarceration after the relevant risk factors were predicted.Results There was no significant difference in the age,gender and other general data and the number,and location of the stones before treatment(P>0.05).The long diameter,CT value and hydronephrosis of the patients in the incarceration group.The incidence rate was significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).Logistic regression showed that the long diameter of the stone,CT value of the stone and hydronephrosis were independent risk factors for the incarceration of ureteral calculi after treatment(OR=1.365,1.011,1.049;P=0.005,<0.001,0.041).The ROC curve showed that the CT value combined with the diameter of the stone was diagnosed and treated with high diagnostic efficiency(AUC=0.903),which was significantly higher than the CT value,the long diameter of the stone,and the single diagnosis of hydronephrosis(Z=2.036,2.790,5.355;every P<0.05),the sensitivity was 89.80%and the specificity was 76.06%.Conclusion Quantitative analysis of urinary CT can effectively predict the incarceration of ureteral calculi after treatment,and the CT value of calculus has high sensitivity and specificity in predicting the incarceration of ureteral calculi after treatment.
作者 赵书晓 李峰 覃智标 毕革文 宁鑫 雷华 黄崛倬 狄金明 Zhao Shuxiao;Li Feng;Qin Zhibiao;Bi Gewen;Ning Xin;Lei Hua;Huang Juezhuo;Di Jinming(Department of Urology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Nanning 530023,China;Department of Urology,the Third Affiliated Hospital,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510630,China)
出处 《中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版)》 2021年第2期126-129,共4页 Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition)
基金 2017国家自然科学基金面上项目(81772752)。
关键词 CT 定量分析 输尿管结石 预测 CT Quantitative analysis Ureteral calculi Prediction
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献18

  • 1Krishnamurthy M S,Ferucci P G,Sankey N,et al.Is stone radiodensity a useful parameter for predicting outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for stones < or = 2 cm?[J].Int Braz J Urol,2005,31 (1):3-8.
  • 2Ruggera L,Beltrami P,Ballario R,et al.Impact of anatomical pielocaliceal topography in the treatment of renal lower calyces stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy[J].Int J Urol,2005,12(6):525-532.
  • 3Symes A,Shaw G,Corry D,et al.Pelvi-calyceal height,a predictor of success when treating lower pole stones with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy[J].Urol Res,2005,33 (4):297 -300.
  • 4Tuckey J,Devasia A,Murthy L,et al.Is there a simpler method for predicting lower pole stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy than measuring infundibulopelvic angle?[J].J Endourol,2000,14(6):475-478.
  • 5Viswaroop B,Devasia A,Gnanaraj L,et al.Radiographic anatomical factors do not predict clearance of lower caliceal calculus by shock-wave lithotripsy[J].Scand J Urol Nephrol,2005,39(3):226-229.
  • 6Srivastava A,Zaman W,Singh V,et al.Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for solitary lower calyceal stone:a statistical model[J].Bju Int,2004,93 (3):364-368.
  • 7Deveci S,Coskun M,Tekin M I,et al.Spiral computed tomography:role in determination of chemical compositions of pure and mixed urinary stones-an in vitro study[J].Urology,2004,64 (2):237-240.
  • 8Gupta,N P,Ansari M S,Kesarvani P,et al.Role of computed tomography with no contrast medium enhancement in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary calculi[J].Bju Int,2005,95 (9):1285-1288.
  • 9Saw K C,Mcateer J A,Fineberg N S,et al.Calcium stone fragility is predicted by helical CT attenuation values[J].J Endouro1,2000,14 (6):471-474.
  • 10Williams J C,Paterson R F,Kopecky K K,et al.High resolution detection of internal structure of renal calculi by helical computerized tomography[J].J Urol,2002,167 (1):322-326.

共引文献31

同被引文献60

引证文献8

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部