摘要
传染病隔离期限是从实体法意义上影响公共利益维护与公民人身自由权行使的“双刃剑”。2020年10月2日公布的《传染病防治法》修订草案第四十四条对隔离期限所作的修改,仍然是以强调行政管理或治理为目的,对行政权的正当行使及程序上的规范并没有过多关注,对公民个人自由权的保障或尊重还没有引起足够重视,与科学防控及法治精神存在一定偏离。建议传染病隔离期限判断依据回归医学检查结果判断标准,以期进一步回归传染病防控的科学性,运用比例原则划定权力边界,最大程度保障公民私权,助力依法隔离制度行稳至远,实现良法善治的图景。
The period of isolation of infectious diseases is a“double-edged sword”that affects the maintenance of public interests and the exercise of citizens’right to personal freedom in the sense of substantive law.Article 44 of the revised draft Law on the Prevention and Treatment of Infectious Diseases,published on October 2,2020,still modifies the quarantine period for the purpose of emphasizing administrative management or governance and does not pay too much attention to the proper exercise of administrative power and procedural regulations.In addition,the protection or respect for citizens’personal freedom has not been paid enough attention,which deviates from scientific prevention and control and the spirit of the rule of law.It is suggested that the period of isolation of infectious diseases should be judged on the basis of returning to the judgment standard of medical examination results in order to further return to the scientific nature of the prevention and control of infectious diseases,delimit the boundary of power for the application of the principle of proportionality,maximize the protection of citizens’private rights,stabilize the isolation system in accordance with the law and achieve the purpose of good law and good governance.
出处
《法治社会》
2021年第3期81-88,共8页
Law-Based Society
基金
国家社科基金后期资助项目“患者权利的法政策学研究”(项目编号:16FFX006)的阶段性成果。
关键词
传染病防治
隔离期限
期限判断标准
法治保障
比例原则
Prevention and Treatment of Infectious Diseases
Isolation Period
Judgment Criteria of Isolation Period
Legal Protection
Principle of Proportionality