摘要
通过对38份相关裁判文书的分析发现,司法实践中有关非法持有宣扬恐怖主义、极端主义物品罪的认定存在诸多问题:涉案物品性质的认定只依靠行政机关的审读意见;行为人主观明知的推定依据不明;情节严重的认定标准不明。解决非法持有宣扬恐怖主义、极端主义物品罪司法认定问题的应有思路是:对于涉案物品的性质,应当将行政机关出具的审读意见仅仅作为证据类型中的鉴定意见,在庭审中进行充分举证质证,司法机关在此基础上综合认定;关于行为人的主观心态,应当完善准法律推定制度并允许被告人进行反驳;关于情节严重,应进一步完善个数与时长相结合的综合认定体系。
Through the analysis of 38 relevant adjudication documents,it is found that there are many problems in ju⁃dicial practice regarding the crime of illegal possession of items propagating terrorism and extremism,for example,the na⁃ture determination of the items involved depends only on the review opinions of administrative organs,the presumption ba⁃sis of actors’subjective knowledge is unclear,and the criteria for determining seriousness of the circumstance are unde⁃fined.The approaches to solving judicial determination on the crime are suggested.The review opinion of item nature issued by the administrative organ should be regarded only as an appraisal opinion in the type of evidence and comprehensive deter⁃mination should be made by the judicial organ based on sufficient evidence given in the trial.With regard to the subjective mentality of the actor,the quasi-legal presumption system should be perfected and the defendant should be allowed to re⁃but.With regard to the circumstances seriousness,the comprehensive identification system combining the case number with the time length should be further improved.
作者
段阳伟
连世红
DUAN Yang-wei;LIAN Shi-hong
出处
《四川警察学院学报》
2021年第3期99-106,共8页
Journal of Sichuan Police College
基金
司法部中青年课题“预防性犯罪化立法对我国刑事立法模式的挑战及应用”(19SFB3017)
西北政法大学义乌研究院横向课题“内地清真概念泛化问题研究”。
关键词
鉴定意见
明知
准法律推定
个数
时长
identification opinions
knowing
quasi-legal presumption
number
the length of time
