摘要
目的探讨钼靶(DM)、自动全容积成像(ABVS)及超声(US)在非肿块型乳腺癌筛查中的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析华东疗养院2016年5月-2020年12月进行DM、ABVS和US乳腺检查的64例非肿块型乳腺癌患者的影像学资料,比较三种检查方法对非肿块型乳腺癌及不同乳腺致密度的非肿块型乳腺癌的检出率和诊断准确率的差异。结果在所有非肿块型乳腺癌及致密型乳腺的非肿块型乳腺癌的筛查中,ABVS检出率高于DM和US,ABVS和US的检出率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);DM与ABVS的诊断准确率均高于US,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在非致密型乳腺中,三种检查方法检出率和诊断准确率的差异无统计学意义。结论ABVS和DM对非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断具有优势。
Objective To investigate the diagnosis value of digital mammography(DM),automated breast volume scanner(ABVS),and ultrasonography(US)in non-mass-like ductal carcinoma of breast.Methods The imaging data of 64 patients with n non-mass-like ductal carcinoma of breast who underwent DM,ABVS and US breast examination in East China sanatorium from May 2016 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.The detection and diagnostic accuracy of the three examination methods for non-mass-like ductal carcinoma of breast and non-mass-like ductal carcinoma of breast with different breast density were compared.Results The detection rate of ABVS was higher than that of DM and US in the screening of all non-mass-like ductal carcinoma of breast and dense breast cancer,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The diagnostic accuracy of DM and ABVS was higher than that of us(P<0.05).In non dense breast,there was no significant difference in the detection rate and diagnostic accuracy among the three methods.Conclusion ABVS and DM have advantages in the diagnosis of non-mass-like ductal carcinoma of breast.
作者
马光慧
黄海峡
汪丽杰
Ma Guanghui;Huang Haixia;Wang Lijie(East China Sanatorium,Wuxi 214065,China)
出处
《健康教育与健康促进》
2021年第3期311-313,共3页
Health Education and Health Promotion
关键词
乳腺癌
乳腺摄影
自动全容积成像
超声
Breast carcinoma
Digital mammography
Automated breast volume scanner
Ultrasonography
