摘要
我国《食品安全法》第136条从违法行为、免责要件和处罚种类等方面明确了特定情形下食品经营者的免责规定。但该条款构成要件中,不确定法律概念和法律效果行政自由裁量的并存使理论和实务界对其解释及适用产生了争议。文章从不确定法律概念的解释与行政裁量权的区分入手,对条款中“进货查验等义务”的范围、“有充分证据”的证明程度进行解释,进一步实现免责条款的立法目的与价值功能。
Article 136 of China’s“Food Safety Law”defines the exemption provisions of food operators under specific circumstances from the aspects of illegal acts,exemption elements and punishment types.However,the coexistence of uncertain legal concept and administrative discretion of legal effect in the constitutive requirements of the clause has caused disputes on its interpretation and application in both theoretical and practical circles.Starting with the interpretation of uncertain legal concepts and the distinction of administrative discretion,this paper explains the scope of“the obligation of purchase inspection”and the proof degree of“there is sufficient evidence...”in the clause,so as to further realize the legislative purpose and value function of the exemption clause.
作者
周晗燕
Zhou Hanyan(School of Law,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
出处
《天津大学学报（社会科学版）》
2021年第4期340-346,共7页
Journal of Tianjin University：Social Sciences
关键词
食品安全法
不确定法律概念解释
行政裁量
尽职免责条款
进货查验义务
Food Safety Law
indefinite legal concept
administrative discretion
due diligence clause
purchase inspection obligation
