期刊文献+

繁简分流问题探析 被引量:1

Study on Problems of Sorting between Simple and Complex Cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 所谓繁简分流,是指在遵循诉讼规律、遵行现行立法规定的前提下,按照司法改革所确定的原则、路径和制度措施,寻求解决案多人少矛盾的办法。囿于繁简分流本身即是一个复杂的系统工程,要受到立法规定、制度条件、司法环境、物质保障、人员素质等多方面的制约和影响,所以虽经积极探索,在取得一些经验的同时,也发现一些问题和困惑。推进繁简分流,要遵循司法活动认知规律进行程序分流,着力破解“送达难”,落实审判工作的信息化建设,提高审判人员业务能力,实现审判辅助性事务集中管理。 Sorting between simple and complex cases means that under the premise of following the law of litigation and complying with the current legislative provisions,as well as in accordance with the principles,paths and institutional measures determined by the judicial reform,the solution to the contradiction between many cases and few people is sought.It is a complicated systematic project,which is restricted by legislative provisions,institutional conditions,judicial environment,material guarantees and personnel quality.Therefore,although we have gained some experience through active exploration,we have also found some problems and puzzles.To promote sorting between simple and complex cases,it is necessary to follow the cognitive law of judicial activities to carry out the separation of procedures,to focus on cracking the“difficulty of service”,to implement the construction of information technology in the trial work,to improve the professional ability of judicial personnel,and to realize the centralized management of auxiliary affairs in the trial.
作者 陈凤贵 洪东冬 Chen Fenggui;Hong Dongdong(College of Law,Shenyang Normal University,Shenyang Liaoning 110034)
出处 《沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 2021年第4期34-41,共8页 Journal of Shenyang Normal University(Social Science Edition)
基金 辽宁省高级人民法院调研课题(LNGFDYK201710)。
关键词 诉讼案件 繁简分流 公正和效率 程序保障 litigation sorting between simple and complex cases fairness and efficiency procedural guarantee
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献43

  • 1《法制日报》2001年4月9日题为“政府败诉拒不执行,法院判决如同废纸”.
  • 2贺卫方.《复转军人进法院》[N].南方周末,1998年1月2日.
  • 3.《消费者权益保护法第49条的解释与适用》[N].《人民法院报》,2001年3月29日.
  • 4左卫民等.《合议制度研究》,法律出版社2002年版.
  • 5Harald Koch & Frank Diedlich, Civil Procedure in Germany,C.H.Beck Munchen,1998.p.128.
  • 6拙文.《‘立审分离’管理模式的质疑》.《人民法院报》2001年10月26日.
  • 7[美]理查德·A,波斯纳.《法律的经济分析》下册,蒋兆康译,中国大百科全书出版社1997年版,第717页.
  • 8J.A.Jolowics.Managing Overload in Appellate Courts:"Western "Countries.p.83.
  • 9[日]棚獭孝雄.《纠纷的解决与审判制度》,王亚新译.中国豉法大学出版社1996年版,第112页.
  • 10Peter Gottwald, Civil Justice Reform: Access, Cost, and Expedition. The German Perspective p.220.

共引文献208

同被引文献21

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部