期刊文献+

侨易学的古典路径:通观立场与侨易学述思转向的可能性 被引量:1

The Classical Path of the Study of Qiaoyi-ology:the General Standpoint and Possibilities of the Change of Thinking in Qiaoyi-ology
原文传递
导出
摘要 如何寻求到"一种可以操作的方式来切入这个已被分科割裂得过于破碎的世界",是现代学者所面临的共同问题和共同焦虑。侨易学试图将当下的碎片世界整合为一个纲举目张的系统。这个系统关心的是"知识的融通",此种知识融通不唯兼容东西,而且并包古今。侨易学的知识论建构是否可能?这就有必要简单回顾一下自然、人文之分的问题。自然、人文之分本来就是一种现代性划分。现代知识的分化本身就是一个问题,这个问题的根源在于西方认识论立场。知识本身是问题而非答案,欲要突破现代学术困境,欲要解决现代世界的破碎状态,就首先要对知识本身予以彻底的、根本的反省。侨易学如果试图和前赋系统论的、百科全书式的问学样式相区别的话,就应当果断地摒弃其百科全书式的知识论诉求。这里就势必预设侨易学的两个转向:从外铄的知识论向内省的德性论转向,从对东西文化的通观而转向到对古典文化的重勘。在对中国古典文化进行全面清理、重新评估基础之上,进一步介入当下世界文化的纷纭现象,或许能够另辟一方天地。 How to find "a workable way to cut into this world which has been too fragmented by different disciplines" is a common problem and anxiety faced by modern scholars. Qiaoyi-ology tries to integrate the fragmented world into a comprehensive system. This system is concerned with the "integration of knowledge", which is not only compatible with things, but also includes the past and the present. Is it possible to construct the epistemology of Qiaoyi-ology? Therefore, it is necessary to review the distinction between natural sciences and humanities. The division of natural science and humanities is a division of modernity. The differentiation of modern knowledge itself is a problem, and the root of this problem lies in the position of western epistemology. Knowledge itself is a problem rather than an answer. If we want to break through the modern academic dilemma and solve the broken state of the modern world, we must first thoroughly and fundamentally reflect on knowledge itself. If Qiaoyi-ology tries to distinguish itself from the encyclopedic style of inquiry learning of the former system theory, it should resolutely abandon its encyclopedic pursuit of epistemology. There are two shifts in the study of the book of changes: one is from the theory of external knowledge to that of introspective virtue;the other is from the general view of Eastern and Western culture to the re-exploration of classical culture. On the basis of a comprehensive clean-up and re-evaluation of Chinese classical culture, further intervention in the current world cultural diversity may be make a new contribution.
作者 李川 Li Chuan(Institute of Foreign Literature,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing,China)
出处 《社会科学论坛》 2021年第4期227-235,共9页 Tribune of Social Sciences
关键词 侨易学 知识论 古典学 Qiaoyi-ology epistemology Classicism
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献38

共引文献59

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部