摘要
2008年金融危机以来,明斯基与奥地利学派的思想呈复兴之势,并常常被相提并论,以至于传言明斯基脱胎于奥地利学派。比较研究发现,尽管明斯基与奥地利学派均构想出一幅由信贷驱动经济繁荣和萧条交替的经济图景,并在阐释这幅图景时遵循了不少类似的方法论,但两者所设想的整体经济图景,即有关经济周期和不稳定性的产生根源、诱发因素以及发展过程和机制,却存在着根本性分歧,从而产生截然相反的政策立场和导向,以及鲜明的方法论差异。并且,这些分歧和差异背后事实上还凸显出两者在货币本质观上更深层次的理论分野。因此,明斯基绝非脱胎于奥地利学派,而是十足的后凯恩斯主义者。综合两者有关货币与经济周期的洞见,对于当前中国防范系统性金融风险和完善宏观经济治理具有重要理论启示。
Since the Great Recession in 2008,the ideas of Hyman Minsky and the Austrian School have been revived,and often compared to the extent that Minsky was allegedly born out of the Austrian School.This comparative study shows that although Minsky and Austrian School both conceive an economic vision of credit driven economic prosperity and depression,and follow many similar methodologies in explaining this vision,there are fundamental differences between the overall economic visions they conceive,that is,the origin,inducing factors,development process and mechanism of economic cycle and instability.These visionary differences result in diametrically opposite policy positions and orientations,as well as distinct methodological differences.In fact,these divergences and differences highlight a deeper theoretical divide in the nature of money.Thus,far from being born of the Austrian School,Minsky is a post-Keynesian.Combined with their insights on money and business cycle,they have important theoretical enlightenments for preventing systemic financial risks and improving macroeconomic governance in China.
出处
《学术月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第7期67-77,共11页
Academic Monthly
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“世界货币制度史的比较研究”(18ZDA089)
国家社会科学基金青年项目“比较视野下的明斯基经济不稳定性思想研究”(18CJL004)的阶段性成果。
关键词
明斯基
奥地利学派
货币
经济周期
Hyman Minsky
the Austrian School
money
business cycle
