期刊文献+

2020年青岛市某餐厨垃圾处理项目职业病危害预评价 被引量:2

Pre-evaluation on occupational hazards in a kitchen waste treatment project,Qingdao city,2020
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的识别与分析某餐厨垃圾处理项目存在的职业病危害因素及危害程度,为完善设计提供必要的对策和建议。方法 2020年10月采用类比法、检查表法及经验法,对类比项目的职业病危害作业现场进行调查、采样和检测,并对该项目进行综合分析评价。结果该建设项目的选址、总体布局、生产设备布局、建筑卫生学、职业病防护设计、卫生辅助用室设施等基本符合国家有关规定,类比现场硫化氢(CMAC:<0.53 mg/m^(3))、氨(CSTEL:0.30~13.97 mg/m^(3);CTWA:1.25~2.12 mg/m^(3))、二氧化硫(CSTEL:<0.60~0.78 mg/m^(3);CTWA:<0.60 mg/m^(3))和噪声(8 h等效A声级:77.60~80.70 dB)检测结果均符合职业接触限值的要求。结论该项目为职业病危害严重的建设项目。 Objective To identify and analyze the occupational hazards and hazards of a kitchen waste treatment project, so as to provide necessary countermeasures and suggestions for perfecting the design. Methods Analogy, checklist and experience methods were used to investigate, sample and test the occupational hazards of the analogy project, and a comprehensive analysis and evaluation of the project was conducted. Results The site selection, general layout, production equipment layout, architectural hygiene, occupational disease protection design, and auxiliary health facilities of the construction project basically complied with the relevant national regulations.The analogy on-site hydrogen sulfide(CMAC:<0.53 mg/m^(3)),ammonia(CSTEL:0.30-13.97 mg/m^(3);CTWA:1.25-2.12 mg/m^(3)),sulfur dioxide(CSTEL:<0.60-0.78 mg/m^(3);CTWA:<0.60 mg/m^(3)) and noise(8 h equivalent A sound level: 77.60-80.70 dB)test results were all in line with the occupation exposure limit requirements. Conclusion This project is a construction project with serious occupational disease hazards.
作者 张克胜 ZHANG Ke-sheng(Comprehensive Supervision and Laxv Enforcement Bureau of Qingdao Shibei District Health Bureau,Qingdao,Shangdong,266000,China)
出处 《预防医学论坛》 2021年第6期477-479,共3页 Preventive Medicine Tribune
关键词 餐厨垃圾 垃圾处理 职业病危害 预评价 Kitchen waste Garbage disposal Occupational hazards Pre-evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献70

共引文献50

同被引文献12

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部