期刊文献+

基于电子档案袋的外语教学评价研究 被引量:5

Research on Electronic Portfolio Assessment in EFL Teaching
原文传递
导出
摘要 电子档案袋是信息技术改进教学评估方式从而实现学生个性化学习的手段,也是学习评价的工具。本文以1990-2020年间SSCI和CSSCI期刊上发表的电子档案袋相关文献为数据来源进行了文献计量分析,重点筛选了外语教学中电子档案袋评价的实证研究文献进行文本细读,针对基于电子档案袋的外语教学评价的研究对象、应用领域、平台与目标设计等方面进行了梳理,结果显示:(1)国际发文量远高于国内;(2)国际研究范围宽泛,但国内外基于电子档案袋的教育应用研究重点基本一致:聚焦教学、学习评价、教师教育和专业发展等;(3)基于电子档案袋的外语教学评价实证研究在多国针对本科生开展,聚焦课程评价和教师培训,课程评价包括写作、听说和词汇等;(4)基于电子档案袋的外语教学评价没有统一、固定的平台,针对不同的课程,研究者选择了不同的平台;(5)中国、土耳其、伊朗等亚洲国家尚处于探索和研究阶段,如何克服技术问题以及网络带来的焦虑,仍需要学者进行探究。文章最后对电子档案袋在我国外语教学评价中的应用提出了建议。 Electronic portfolio(e-portfolio),originated from portfolio and connected with information technology,is universally applied to various areas of education and teaching such as online courses,teaching assessment,teacher education and training as well as teacher recruitment.Empirical researches show that,if designed and implemented properly,e-portfolio can promote peer evaluation and self-reflection,increase learners’ involvement in learning process,thus provide a brand-new perspective of authentic assessment.Scholars in Europe and America have greatly contributed to the development of e-portfolio in EFL and there are already three kinds of language portfolios:European Language Portfolio(ELP),Global Language Portfolio(GLP) and LinguaFolio(LF).However,much fewer researches have been conducted on e-portfolio in EFL in other geographical areas than Europe and America,most of which are limited to the theoretical level and are not systetmatic.This paper uses SSCI and CSSC I-indexed journals as the data source,selects relevant literature on e-portfolios from 1990 to 2020,and uses CiteSpace 5.7 to conduct a bibliometric comparative analysis.Results indicate that the international publications are far more than domestic ones,but the focus of the researches on e-portfolio in education is basically the same at home and abroad:focusing on e-portfolio in teaching,learning assessment,teacher education and professional development.The collected literature that are closely related to eportfolio assessment in EFL teaching are analyzed from the aspects of research objects,application fields,platform and target design.Results of the analysis show that electronic portfolio assessment in foreign language teaching can increase the interest of the course and the motivation of the learners,promote peer evaluation,teacher feedback and self-reflection.There is no fixed software system for e-portfolio assessment,so researchers choose different platforms for various courses and objectives.It is widely used in foreign language writing,listening and speaking,vocabulary and teacher training.However,Asian countries such as C hina,Turkey,and Iran are still at the stage of exploring and researching language electronic portfolios to overcome technical problems and anxiety caused by the Internet.Given the status quo in China,the article concludes by proving suggestions for the further development of eportfolio assessment in EFL at home.First,following C EFR and 5 C,specific standards and objectives should be determined to lay a solid foundation for the implementation of formative assessment.Second,cultivating the culture of assessment and fostering the awareness and participation of eportfolio assessment.Third,equipping teachers and learners with adequate knowledge of information technology should also be attached great importance,which can reduce the difficulty of operation and improve efficiency.Finally,domestic scholars should strengthen international cooperation in broadening research fields and subjects,and especially learn the experience of e-portfolio development and application through academic exchanges with European and American countries.
作者 谈宏慧 黎师然 贺荣昭 TAN Honghui;LI Shiran;HE Rongzhao(School of Foreign Studies,Yangtze University,JingZhou,Hubei 434023,China)
出处 《外语电化教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第3期89-95,14,共8页 Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education
基金 湖北省高等学校哲学社会科学重大项目“《楚辞》文化融入高校英语课堂教学研究”(项目编号:20ZD037) 湖北省级教学研究项目“‘新文科’背景下商务英语一流本科专业建设研究”(项目编号:2020411)的阶段性成果。
关键词 电子档案袋 外语教学 评价 E-portfolio Foreign Language Teaching Assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献105

同被引文献22

引证文献5

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部