期刊文献+

城市生活垃圾处理收费模式比选研究 被引量:1

Comparison and selection of charge models for municipal solid waste treatment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文从经济、环境、社会、技术四个方面构建了9个评价指标,利用网络层次分析法(ANP)—熵值法综合确定各指标权重,基于集对分析方法构建城市生活垃圾处理收费模式比选模型。以沈阳市为例开展实证研究,针对沈阳市的实际情况设计了四种具体的收费模式,构建优、良、中、差四个等级,对收费模式进行评价和选择。结果显示,"水消费系数法"收费模式为当前形势及条件下适宜的生活垃圾处理收费模式,能解决当前存在的垃圾处理费收缴率低和收费成本高的难题。 This article constructs nine evaluation indicators from four aspects of economy, environment, society and technology.The weights of each indicator were comprehensively determined using the ANP-entropy weight method, and comparison and selection model of charging models for municipal solid waste treatment was constructed based on set pair analysis.Then Shenyang City, as an example, is carried out empirical research.According to the actual situation of Shenyang City, four specific charging models are designed.Four grades of excellent, good, medium and poor are designed to evaluate and select the charging mode.The results show that the Water Consumption Coefficient Method charging model is an appropriate domestic waste treatment charging model under the current situation and conditions, which can solve the current problems of low collection rate of waste treatment fees and high cost of charges.
作者 吕露 陈海滨 苗雨 汪俊时 曹方琼 欧阳秀莉 万能 黄尧 阮滨 段盼盼 LV Lu;CHEN Haibin;MIAO Yu;WANG Junshi;CAO Fangqiong;OUYANG Xiuli;WAN Neng;HUANG Yao;RUAN Bin;DUAN PanPan(1 Huazhong LDiversity of Science and Technology,Wzuhan 430074,China;Wuhan Huaxi Science and Technology Development Co.,Ltd.,Wzuhan 430070,China)
出处 《环境与可持续发展》 2021年第4期84-87,共4页 Environment and Sustainable Development
关键词 “水消费系数法” 按量收费 ANP—熵值法 集对分析法 Water Consumption Coefficient Method pay as you throw ANP-entropy method set pair analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献34

  • 1王琪.我国城市生活垃圾处理现状及存在的问题[J].环境经济,2005(10):23-29. 被引量:50
  • 2郭守亭,王建明.垃圾外部性:本质特征、经济解释和管制政策[J].管理世界,2007,23(9):154-155. 被引量:3
  • 3顾全俊:国外城市垃圾处理面面观,《经济日报》,2010年6月19日.
  • 4ABDEL- ATY MOHAMED A, ABDELWAHAB HASSAN T. Predicting injury severity levels in traffic crashes: a modeling comparison[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2004, 130(2): 204 - 210.
  • 5HADAYEGHI A, SHALABY A S, Persaud B N. Macro - level accident prediction models for evaluating the safety of urban transportation systems [ J]. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2003, 1840 (1): 87 - 95.
  • 6AL- HAJI G. Road safety development index[ D]. Link~ping: Link6ping University, 2003.
  • 7DRAGAN J. The application of reliability models in traffic accident frequencyanalysis [J].Safety Science, 2011, 49 (8) 1 246 - 1 251.
  • 8陈爱国,唐雯,张冬丽.系统运行绩效评价研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.
  • 9中华人民共和国交通运输部.公路养护技术规范:JTGH10-2009[S].北京:人民交通出版社,2009.
  • 10徐丹.福建省高等级公路交通安全评价研究[R].福州:福建省交通科学技术研究所,2014.

共引文献40

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部