摘要
标准必要专利国际间禁令救济司法实践案例越来越多。禁令救济主要用于维护专利权人合法利益,但也存在一定滥用禁令救济的行为,排除限制了市场竞争,不利于技术创新和市场有序发展。针对我国存在的标准必要专利的禁令救济法律规定模糊,合同法、专利法、反垄断法等司法规制途径混乱等现状,应明晰禁令救济的诉前程序,使专利权人与使用人双方遵循诚实守信原则、社会公共利益原则、合理原则和自由竞争原则,区别滥用标准必要专利禁令救济垄断行为,并完善标准必要专利禁令救济反垄断规制的框架构建。
There are more and more cases of injunctive relief of standard essential patents in international judicial practice.Injunctive relief is mainly used to protect the legitimate interests of patentees,but there are some acts of abuse of injunctive relief,excluding the restriction of market competition,it is not conducive to technological innovation and orderly development of the market,the legal provisions on injunctive relief for standard essential patents in China are vague,and the judicial regulation of anti-monopoly law in contract law is confused,the pre-suit procedure of injunctive relief is supposed to clearly defined,and both the patentee and the user shall abide by the principles of honesty and trustworthiness,public interest,rationality and free competition,distinguishing the abuse of standard essential patent injunction to remedy monopoly,perfecting the framework of standard essential patent injunction to remedy anti-monopoly regulation.
作者
黄琍
HUANG Li(Jiangsu Urban Rural Construction Vocational College,Changzhou 213147,China)
出处
《黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报》
2021年第5期67-70,89,共5页
Journal of Heilongjiang Vocational Institute of Ecological Engineering
关键词
标准必要专利
禁令救济
反垄断法
Standard Essential Patents
Injunctive relief
Antimonopoly law
