期刊文献+

网购标价错误案件裁判思路研究——以74份裁判文书为研究对象

Research on Trial of Cases of Wrong Price Marking in Online Shopping——Take 74 Judgment Documents as the Research Object
下载PDF
导出
摘要 网络交易环境引发的消费纠纷案件给法院在事实认定及法律适用上带来了全新挑战,网购标价错误案件便是其中之一。选取74份涉标价错误的裁判文书,对网购标价错误案件的司法审判进行研究。在现行法律下审判网购标价错误案件,需在尊重市场交易规律的基础上结合网络环境特性对标价错误作出准确认定,分阶段以“合同效力路径”和“合同履行请求权阻却路径”为裁判逻辑并统一赔偿责任标准,平衡经营者与消费者的利益,营造公平稳定的网络交易环境,以促进网络购物市场的发展。 Consumer dispute cases caused by online consumption environment have brought new challenges to the court in fact finding and law application.Select 74 judgment documents involving wrong bidding price to study the judicial trial of the wrong bidding price case of online shopping.Under the current law,in the trial of online shopping bidding errors,it is necessary to accurately determine the bidding errors based on the respect of market transaction laws and combining the characteristics of the network environment.The“path of contract effectiveness”and“path of contract performance request blocking”shall be used as judges in stages.Logic and unify the liability standards,balance the interests of operators and consumers,create a fair and stable online trading environment,and promote the development of the online shopping market.
作者 陶宇鑫 TAO Yu-xin(Guangxi University,Nanning 530004,China)
机构地区 广西大学法学院
出处 《黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报》 2021年第5期74-78,共5页 Journal of Heilongjiang Vocational Institute of Ecological Engineering
关键词 标价错误 网络购物 合同履行请求权 公序良俗 Wrong price Online shopping Contract performance request Public order and good customs
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献100

共引文献408

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部