摘要
兴奋剂纠纷属于民事纠纷还是刑事纠纷在学理上存在一定的争议,这直接影响到兴奋剂仲裁的程序设置。通过对传统的刑事、民事、行政程序划分原因的研究,得出程序划分的关键因素是当事人的力量对比程度和处罚的严重程度,不应当绝对地将纠纷解决程序归类于刑事、民事、行政程序,应该根据当事人的力量对比状况和案件所涉及的处罚的严重程度来决定给予当事人何种程度的程序保障。研究发现,兴奋剂纪律处罚纠纷比其他行业纪律处罚后果更为严重,当事人力量对比更大,因此应构筑一个程序保障程度不同于传统刑事、民事、行政程序的特殊仲裁程序以解决兴奋剂纠纷。
Whether doping dispute belongs to civil dispute or criminal dispute exists some controversies in academic theory,which directly affects the procedure setting of doping arbitration.Through the study of the reasons for the traditional division of criminal,civil and administrative procedures,it is concluded that the key factors for the division of procedures are the degree of power contrast between parties and the severity of punishment,and the dispute settlement procedures should not be categorized into criminal,civil and administrative procedures absolutely.The degree of procedural protection should be decided according to the balance of power of the parties and the severity of the punishment involved in the case.It is found that the consequences of doping disciplinary punishment disputes are more serious than those in other industries,and the strength of the parties is greater.Therefore,a special arbitration procedure with different procedural guarantee degree from the traditional criminal,civil and administrative procedures should be constructed to solve the doping disputes.
作者
宋彬龄
王颖
Song Binling;Wang Ying(Law School,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan,Hunan 411105,China)
出处
《黑龙江工业学院学报（综合版）》
2021年第6期140-146,共7页
Journal of Heilongjiang University of Technology(Comprehensive Edition)
基金
湖南省社科基金一般项目“国际体育仲裁院兴奋剂案例梳理研究”(项目编号:17YBA367)
湖南省社会科学成果评审委员会一般资助项目“系统性兴奋剂违规行为的法律规制”(项目编号:XSP18YBZ089)
湘潭大学教学改革研究项目“法学院体育法课程教材建设研究”。
关键词
兴奋剂
仲裁程序
纠纷类型化
doping
arbitration procedures
categorization of disputes
