摘要
目前,竞业限制在实践中对劳动者泛化适用的问题愈发显著,许多本不必要承担竞业义务的劳动者不得不受到竞业协议的限制。欲对该现象进行规制,应当明确竞业限制的义务主体为知悉商业秘密的劳动者,并将竞业限制的保护客体限定在可能对用人单位造成重大损害的商业秘密范围内。还应当明确对于劳动者是竞业协议适格义务主体的举证责任由用人单位一方承担,同时将利益平衡原则作为个案裁判中的指导原则。
At present,the problem of the application of non-competition to workers is becoming more and more obvious in practice.Many workers who do not need to undertake the obligation of competition have to be restricted by the agreement of competition.In order to regulate this phenomenon,it should be clear that the subject of the obligation of non-competition is the laborer who knows the trade secret,and the protection object of non-competition should be limited to the trade secret which may cause great damage to the employer.It is clear that the burden of proof is borne by the employer that the laborer is the subject of the eligible obligation of the competition agreement,and the principle of balance of interests is taken as the guiding principle in case judgment.
作者
熊晖
王瑞宏
XIONG Hui;WANG Ruihong(Economic Law School,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
出处
《重庆理工大学学报（社会科学）》
2021年第9期163-175,共13页
Journal of Chongqing University of Technology（Social Science）
基金
重庆市教育委员会人文社会科学项目“集体劳动关系法律调整机制的实现研究”(16SKH014)
中国法学会部级一般项目“我国《集体合同法》立法研究”(GLS(2018)C31)。
关键词
竞业限制
泛化适用
利益平衡原则
用人单位
劳动者
non-competition
application expansion
principle of interest balance
employer
employee
