期刊文献+

1,25(OH)_(2)D_(3)对实验性自身免疫性神经炎大鼠肠道菌群的影响 被引量:1

Effects of 1,25(OH)_(2)D_(3) on gut microbiota in experimental autoimmune neuritis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:16S rDNA高通量测序观察1,25(OH)_(2)D_(3)对实验性自身免疫性神经炎肠道菌群的影响。方法:采用人工合成P0180-199肽段与完全弗氏佐剂混合免疫Lewis大鼠建立EAN模型,1,25(OH)_(2)D_(3)末次灌胃后无菌收集粪便,采用Illumina Miseq PE300型高通量测序仪检测肠道菌群16S rDNA V3-V4可变区,分析肠道菌群结构和丰度变化。结果:1,25(OH)2D3干预可调节EAN大鼠肠道菌群Alpha、Beta多样性,提高菌群丰度、多样性指数。EAN大鼠粪便Verrucomicrobiaceae、Enterobacteriaceae显著增加,Lachnospiraceae、Ruminococcaceae显著减少,均在1,25(OH)_(2)D_(3)干预后回调。结论:1,25(OH)_(2)D_(3)对EAN大鼠肠道菌群有调节作用,肠道微生态的变化可能用于解释EAN的发病机制。 Objective:To explore the intervention effects of active Vitamin D_(3) on gut microbiotal in experimental autoim⁃mune neuritis through 16S rDNA gene sequencing.Methods:EAN model was established by actively immunizing lewis rat with synthetic P0180-199 pepide.The feces were collected aseptically after the last gastric gavage.The fecal DNA was ex⁃tracted and the V3-V4 variable regions of 16S rDNA gene were amplified and sequenced by Illumina Miseq PE300.Gut mi⁃crobial community structure and relative abundance were analyzed using out venn,lefse,etc.Results:1,25(OH)_(2)D_(3) treat⁃ment of EAN rats regulated the alpha and beta diversity index,improved gut microbial diversity.The EAN rats showed a significant increase in Verrucomicrobiaceae,Enterobacteriaeae,and a significant decrease in Lachnospiraceae,Rumino⁃coccaceae,both of them were changed by 1,25(OH)_(2)D_(3).Conclusion:1,25(OH)_(2)D_(3) could regulate the gut microbio⁃ta of EAN rats,and the changes in gut micrbiota,may be used to explain the pathogenesis of EAN.
作者 年娣 孙俊杰 李卓含 张楠 江冉冉 时鹏 NIAN Di;SUN Jun-jie;LI Zhuo-han;ZHANG Nan;JIANG Ran-ran;SHI Peng(Department of Laboratory Medicine,Bengbu Medical College;Bengbu Medical College;Department of Neurology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College,Anhui,Bengbu 233000)
出处 《赣南医学院学报》 2021年第10期977-983,1029,共8页 JOURNAL OF GANNAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
基金 安徽省教育厅重点项目(KJ2020A0570,KJ2019A0377) 蚌埠医学院大学生创新创业训练计划项目(bydc2020022)。
关键词 实验性自身免疫性神经炎 1 25(OH)_(2)D_(3) 肠道微生物 16S rDNA Experimental autoimmune neuritis 1,25(OH)_(2)D_(3) Gut microbiota 16S rDNA
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献89

  • 1Takatsugu Oida,Kenji Mimatsu,Hiso Kano,Atsushi Kawasaki,Youichi Kuboi,Nobutada Fukino,Sadao Amano.Pericardiocentesis with cisplatin for malignant pericardial effusion and tamponade[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(6):740-744. 被引量:19
  • 2Jae Sung Ko,Hye Ran Yang,Ju Young Chang,Jeong Kee Seo.Lactobacillus plantarum inhibits epithelial barrier dysfunction and interleukin-8 secretion induced by tumor necrosis factor-a[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2007,13(13):1962-1965. 被引量:18
  • 3MENNIGEN R, BRUEWER M.Effect of probiotics on intestinal barrier function [ J ] .Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2009,1165 ( 1 ) : 183-189.
  • 4OHLAND C L,MACNAUGHTON W K.Probiotic bacteria and intestinal epithelial barrier function[J].American Journal of Physiology:Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology,2010,298(6):G807-G819.
  • 5BAUMGART D C, DIGNASS A U. Intestinal barrier function[ J] .Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, 2002,5 (6) : 685-694.
  • 6MAYNARD C L,ELSON C O,HATTON R D,et al.Reciprocal interactions of the intestinal microbiota and immune system [ J ]. Nature, 2012,489 ( 7415 ) : 231 - 241.
  • 7SOMMER F, BACKHED F. The gut microbiota-mas- ters of host development and physiology [ J ]. Nature Reviews Microbiology,2013,11 (4) :227-238.
  • 8WALTER J.Ecological role of lactobacilli in the gas- trointestinal tract:implications for fundamental and bi- omedical research[ J] .Applied and Environmental Mi- crobiology, 2008,74 (16) : 4985-4996.
  • 9LI X J, YUE L Y, GUAN X F, et al.The adhesion of putative probiotic lactobacilli to cultured epithelial cells and porcine intestinal mucus [ J ]. Journal of Ap- plied Microbiology,2008,104(4) : 1082-1091.
  • 10GAO Y, HAN F, HUANG X, et al.Changes in gut mi- crobial populations, intestinal morphology, expression of tight junction proteins, and cytokine production be- tween two pig breeds after challenge with Escherichia coli K88 : a comparative study [ J ]. Journal of Animal Science, 2013,91 (12) : 5614-5625.

共引文献64

同被引文献9

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部