摘要
现有的关于家务贡献补偿的研究,未区分共相的性别角色和个案中的性别角色,未区分补偿的对象和影响补偿的因素,且对我国夫妻共同财产制固有的补偿作用关注不足。我国法律上的夫妻共同财产分割,采用的其实是公平原则而非均等分割,本身具有家务贡献补偿功能。在特定情形下,共同财产制的家务贡献补偿功能会失灵,需引入另行补偿模式作为“补丁”。《婚姻法》第40条对失灵补救不力,《民法典》第1088条取而代之。在规范适用时,需避免“补偿不足”和“重复补偿”两个极端,法院应当根据当事人的诉讼请求,并综合考虑具体案情中的各种相关因素,确定补偿的模式和数量,尤其不能机械地采用“一人一半”加“另行补偿”的模式。
Existing studies on compensation for the contribution to housework does not distinguish between universal gender roles and individual gender roles,and does not distinguish between the object of compensation and the factors that affect compensation either.Moreover,there is a lack of understanding on the inherent function of compensation for the contribution to housework under the community property system in China.In China,laws adopt the principle of fairness rather than the principle of equality when dividing the community property between husband and wife.This principle itself functions to make up for the contribution to housework itself.However,under certain circumstances,this principle may not function well to respect the contribution to housework and a theory of“additional compensation”needs to be introduced as a“patch”.In other words,when Article 40 of the Marriage Law is insufficient to appreciate the contribution to housework,Article 1088 of the Civil Code can kick in to realize the due compensation.When applying these rules,it is important for courts to hear the petitioner’s voice and to take into consideration various factors of the case to determine the mode and weight of the compensation so to strike a balance between insufficient and excessive compensation.
作者
高兴
GAO Xing(Law School, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China)
出处
《重庆理工大学学报（社会科学）》
2021年第11期151-158,共8页
Journal of Chongqing University of Technology（Social Science）
基金
上海市哲学社会科学规划年度课题“《上海市性别平等促进条例》立法研究”(2021EFX007)。
关键词
家务贡献补偿
共同财产制
分别财产制
compensation for the contribution to housework
community property system
separate property system
