摘要
目的了解开放科学环境下国内麻醉学者对医学期刊同行评议模式的认知情况。方法采用自制的调查问卷,于2019年5月通过问卷星平台发放和收集,包括审稿模式、是否开放其他审稿人的意见、是否关注稿件的结局、对开放科学的了解程度等。结果受访者来自全国28个省、自治区、直辖市,71.6%的受访者选择双盲评审,超过50%的受访者没有接受过审稿方面的培训,超过90%的受访者希望看到其他审稿人意见,同时,超过90%的受访者对发表后评议了解不多甚至是完全不了解。结论开放科学环境下国内麻醉学者对同行评议模式的了解程度有限,需对审稿专家进行相关培训,以提高国内学者对同行评议模式的认知度。
Objective The cognition of Chinese anesthesiologists on the models of peer review of medical journals in an open science area.Methods Questionnaires designed by authors were distributed to the anesthesiologists in China in May 2019.The questions included the models of peer review,whether or not the comments of other reviewers unblinded,whether or not reviewers concerning the state of manuscripts,and the level of understanding on open science.Results The respondents were from 28 provinces in China.71.6%of the respondents selected double-blind peer review.More than 50%of the respondents had not received review training.Furthermore,more than 90%respondents would like to read the comments of other reviewers.However,over 90%respondents hardly understood the post-publishing peer review(PPPR).Conclusion The degree of knowledge on the models of peer review by Chinese anesthesiologists are limited.Much more review training would be needed to enhance the level of understanding on the peer review mode.
作者
张伟
秦婷婷
张明丽
万茹
ZHANG Wei;QIN Tingting;ZHANG Mingli;WAN Ru(Editorial Office of Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology,Nanjing Medical Association,Nanjing 210003,China)
出处
《临床麻醉学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2021年第10期1078-1081,共4页
Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
基金
南京市医学科技发展项目(YKK17205)。
关键词
开放科学
医学期刊
同行评议
麻醉学
Open science
Medical journal
Peer review
Anesthesiology
