摘要
已有判决表明,绿色原则在司法实践中至少有5种适用情形和功能:一是理解大前提,对法律规则作有利于环保的解释;二是判断小前提,对法律事实作倾斜于环保的认定;三是裁剪结论,根据环境效果回应诉讼请求,合理确定责任方式;四是补充规范,通过环境友好的解决方案填补法律漏洞;五是铺垫引申,强化扩展既定裁判的环保效果。绿色原则司法适用的根源在于现代民法与生态文明建设的不适应性,其前景广阔,应认真对待。
Relevant judgments have shown that there are at least five kinds of application of green principle in judicial practice.First,to understand the major premise and explain the legal rules in favor of environmental protection. Second,to judge the minor premise,and to make the identification of legal facts in favor of environmental protection. The third is to tailor the conclusion,responding to the claims based on environmental effect and reasonably determining the responsibility mode. Fourth,to supplement norms and fulfill the loopholes through environmentally friendly solutions. Fifth,pave the way for extension,strengthen and expand the environmental protection effect of the established judgment. The source of the judicial application of green principle lies in the incompatibility between modern civil law and the construction of ecological civilization,which has broad prospects and should be taken seriously.
出处
《南京工业大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2021年第6期1-14,111,共15页
Journal of Nanjing Tech University：Social Science Edition
基金
国家社会科学基金一般项目“资源国家所有权与生态环境监管权关系研究”(19BFX172)。
