摘要
数据价值来自聚合形成规模后在流动中获得多元、多维开发,因此数据界权不应受确立财产所有权思路的局限,而应致力于调整社会主体间围绕数据价值开发利用而形成的具体利益互动关系。霍菲尔德框架为数据界权的关系进路提供了有启发性的概念工具。无论针对个人信息、企业数据还是公共数据,法律界权都应被理解为逐步搭建、并灵活调整多元主体间法律关系网络的过程。通过在边际上不断探索有助于数据流动、共享的机制,法律界权方有望促进数据价值开发并推动公共利益实现。
The value of data derives from its aggregation,mobility,and exploitation by multiple parties for diverse purposes.It is hence not advisable that the legal delimitation of data entitlements emulate that of real property.Instead,regimes for data rights must provide settlements for a range of interactive relations among various interested parties with respect to the exploitation of data values.Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld’s framework of jural relations offers a useful conceptual tool.The nature of delimitation of data rights,across institutional contexts in relation to personal,corporate,and government data,may be properly understood as gradually and flexibly constructing a nexus of Hohfeldian,inter-subject jural relations.The legal delimitation of data rights may promote both the economic value and public interest through exploring legal and institutional mechanisms that are conducive,on the margin,to greater data mobility and broader data sharing.
出处
《中外法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第6期1561-1580,共20页
Peking University Law Journal
基金
教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目《大数据时代个人信息保护边界与策略研究》(项目编号:17JZD031)
研究阐释党的十九届五中全会精神国家社科基金重大项目“推进土地、劳动力、资本、技术、数据等要素市场化改革研究”(项目编号:21ZDA049)子课题“数据要素市场建制与法律治理”资助。
关键词
界权
法律关系
个人信息保护
企业数据
公共数据
Delimitation of Rights
Jural Relations
Personal Data Protection
Corporate Data
Government Data
