摘要
裁量怠惰与滥用两种瑕疵的存在,使得作为最适控权工具的裁量基准,既要保证控权规则的普遍遵循,又要关照个案情况的特殊考量。无论是填补规则漏洞的需要,还是依法行政的要求,抑或是实质法治的需要,都可以证成个案特殊情况下,执法者基于立法目的和裁量原意之考量,例外逸脱适用裁量基准的正当性。为了减轻逸脱适用可能导致的权力滥用风险,又有必要通过事前设定正当合理的逸脱启动条件、事中提供具体翔实的逸脱操作程序、事后创设安全可靠的逸脱监督机制之方式,确保逸脱行为始终作为一种合法的、例外的、必要的、谦抑的裁量基准调节装置而存在。
The existence of two kinds of discretion flaws,laziness and abuse,makes the discretion standard,as the most suitable tool for power control,have to rectify and adjust its own applicable rules,which should not only ensure the general compliance of power control rules,but also pay attention to the special considerations of individual cases.Whether it is the need to fill the loopholes in the rules,the requirements of administration according to law,or the need of the substantive rule of law,it can prove the legitimacy of the application of the discretion standard in exceptional deviation based on the legislative purpose and the original intention of discretion.However,in order to avoid the risk of power abuse that may be caused by emphasizing the application of deviation,it is necessary to set proper and reasonable conditions for starting deviation in advance,provide specific and detailed operation procedures for deviation,and create a safe and reliable supervision mechanism for deviation afterwards,so as to ensure that deviation behavior is always a legal,exceptional,necessary and modest discretion standard adjustment device.
出处
《财经法学》
CSSCI
2022年第1期117-132,共16页
Law and Economy
关键词
行政处罚
行政裁量
裁量基准
基准逸脱
个案正义
administrative penalty
administrative discretion
discretionary standard
deviation of discretionary standard
case justice
