期刊文献+

临床测量中定量数据Bland-Altman一致性评价 被引量:12

Bland-Altman Method for Assessing Agreement of Quantitative Data in Clinical Measurement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着医疗技术的进步,各种新技术与新方法不断涌现,评价这些方法测量结果的一致性尤为重要。可靠的一致性评价结果对提高医疗服务质量、减少医疗资源浪费具有重要意义。目前我国对临床测量中Bland-Altman一致性评价方法的研究较少,且在临床应用中该方法的使用不当问题凸显。本文讨论单次测量和重复测量情况下的Bland-Altman一致性评价流程,针对不同数据类型介绍其处理方式,并对该方法的使用规范进行梳理,以帮助医学工作人员在临床数据分析中正确使用统计分析方法。 With the advancement of medical technology,new technologies and new methods continue to emerge.It is particularly important to compare and evaluate the agreement of the measurement results of the old and new methods.Reliable evaluation results of agreement are of great importance to improve the quality of medical services and reduce the waste of medical resources.Currently,there are few studies on the Bland-Altman method of agreement evaluation in clinical measurement in China,and there are many problems in the clinical application of the method.This paper discusses the Bland-Altman evaluation process of agreement in the case of single measurement and repeated measurement,and provides processing methods for different data types and the overall guideline in the hope that this can help medical researchers to choose and use statistical analysis methods properly in clinical data analysis.
作者 付美子 林炳清 FU Meizi;LIN Bingqing(School of Mathematics and Statistics,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen Guangdong 518060,China)
出处 《广西师范大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2022年第1期125-138,共14页 Journal of Guangxi Normal University:Natural Science Edition
基金 国家自然科学基金(11701386)。
关键词 一致性评价 Bland-Altman方法 临床测量 定量数据 医疗器械 assessing agreement Bland-Altman method clinical measurement quantitative data medical devices
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献81

共引文献477

同被引文献115

引证文献12

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部