摘要
互有过失船舶碰撞致一船溢油责任主体识别是一大难点,学者观点并不一致,实务中也有不同做法,不利于海洋环境的保护。在对船舶碰撞溢油案件收集梳理的基础上对数据进行对比分析,得出目前海事法院在审理船舶碰撞溢油案件时一定程度上存在同案不同判现象——既有让溢油船承担责任也有让非溢油方共同承担责任的结论。对船舶碰撞溢油责任承担认定不同原因进行剖析,以此为基础就溢油清除单位处理此类纠纷可能采取的对策进行探讨,并对海事法院统一司法实践提出了建议。
It is a difficult issue to identify the subject responsible for oil spill caused by the collision between vessels both with negligence.Scholars have different views toward the issue,and practice also differs,which is not conducive to the protection of marine environment.On the basis of collecting and sorting out the cases of ship collision and oil spill,this paper makes a comparative analysis of the data,and concludes that the current maritime court,to a certain extent,has different judgments for similar cases when it comes to cases of ship collision and oil spill.According to the judgments,in some cases,the vessel of oil spill should bear the responsibility,and in others,the non-oil spill party should bear the responsibility jointly with the oil-spill vessel.This paper probes into the causes for the differentiated determination of liability for oil spill in ship collisions,and on this basis,analyzes the possible countermeasures for the oil-spill cleaning agencies to handle such disputes,and puts forward suggestions for the unified judicial practice of maritime courts.
出处
《中国海事》
2022年第1期60-64,共5页
China Maritime Safety
关键词
船舶
碰撞
溢油
责任主体
海事法院
Ship
collision
oil spill
subject of responsibility
maritime court
