摘要
盗窃罪与抢夺罪的界分实际是刑法解释问题,应回归至解释论予以解决。"盗窃"的解释结论可成为两罪的界分依据。解释方法的位阶决定了形式解释具有优先适用性,实质解释具有限定适用性。通过文义解释和比较解释,发现"盗窃"包含"公开性"和"秘密性"的背反含义。此路径无法得出可靠结论,需进行实质解释。通过目的解释和体系解释,发现"平和性"是"盗窃"的特有含义,应成为界分盗窃罪与抢夺罪的最佳标准。该标准不会降低民众对刑法的认同,反而会增加民众对刑法的信任。
The distinction between larceny and robbery is actually a problem of criminal law interpretation,which should be solved by returning to the theory of interpretation.The interpretation conclusion of"theft"can be the basis for dividing the two crimes.The rank of interpretation method determines that formal interpretation has priority applicability,and substantive interpretation has limited applicability.Through textual interpretation and comparative interpretation,it is found that"theft"includes the opposite meaning of"openness"and"secrecy".This path cannot draw reliable conclusions and needs substantive explanation.Through the purpose interpretation and system interpretation,it is found that"peace"is the unique meaning of"theft"and should become the best standard to distinguish theft and robbery.This standard will not reduce people’s recognition of criminal law,but will increase people’s trust in criminal law.
作者
柳忠卫
张民兴
Liu Zhongwei;Zhang Minxing
出处
《湖湘法学评论》
2021年第2期82-94,共13页
HUXIANG LAW REVIEW
关键词
形式解释
实质解释
秘密性
平和性
formal interpretation
substantive interpretation
confidentiality
non-violence nature
non-violence
