期刊文献+

回归本体价值的德育评价改革 被引量:17

The Reform of Moral Education Evaluation by Returning to Ontological Value
原文传递
导出
摘要 本体价值作为一切价值的存在基础和最终依据,它为我们的德育评价提供了价值指引和目的导向。当前,德育评价体系正遭受着科学实证主义、绩效主义等思潮的不良影响,形成了工具价值对本体价值的遮蔽,导致德育评价愈来愈失去了对本体价值的追求,愈来愈疏离于人的道德生命、精神生命的整全发展。回归本体价值的德育评价改革,可以有效地克服德育评价的合理性危机,形成正确的评价导向。为此,德育评价应不断破除科学实证主义、绩效主义、工具理性带来的不良影响,形成人本主义、生成主义、建构主义的评价理念;不断破除绩效主义管理体系的束缚,创建多元协商、共建共治的德育评价治理体系;建构融合性评价、开放性评价、增值性评价等多元评价方法,真正从内在性、精神性、人格性的角度来综合评价以及引导人的道德成长。 As the existence foundation and final basis of all values, the ontological Value provides value orientation and purpose guidance for our moral education evaluation. At present, we are suffering from the harmful effect of scientific positivism and performancism. It results in the obscuration of Instrumental value over ontological value. As a result, the moral education evaluation is more and more alienated from the whole development of human moral life and spiritual life. The reform of moral education evaluation based on ontological value can effectively overcome the rationality crisis of moral education evaluation and form the correct orientation for it. Therefore, moral education evaluation should break away from the negative effects of scientific positivism, performancism, and instrumental rationalism, and form the evaluation ideas of humanism, and constructivism, establish a governance system with multiple consultation, joint construction, and joint governance, which can break the shackle of performancism system. It should construct multiple evaluation methods such as integrated evaluation, open evaluation and value-added evaluation, so as to evaluate and guide people’s moral growth from the perspective of intrinsic, spiritual and personality.
作者 叶飞 Ye Fei
出处 《南京社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第1期147-154,共8页 Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences
基金 国家社科基金一般项目“道德教育与‘公共人’的培育研究”(BEA170105)的阶段性成果。
关键词 德育评价 本体价值 工具价值 评价改革 moral education evaluation ontological value instrumental value evaluation reform
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献36

  • 1赵之浩.从赋值到增值:新时代学生德育评价的理念转型与实践探索[J].上海教育科研,2021(2):40-44. 被引量:14
  • 2陈志强.论素质教育的本体价值[J].湖南师范大学社会科学学报,1998,27(2):73-78. 被引量:2
  • 3邓安庆.论价值哲学的本体论问题[J].江汉论坛,1997(3):52-55. 被引量:6
  • 4喻文德.论本体价值的建构[J].求索,2007(6):160-162. 被引量:25
  • 5Hershberg, T, Adams Simon, V, & Lea-Kruger, B. The Revelations of Value-added. The School Administrator. 2004,12: 10-14.
  • 6BFK: Project SOAR. Battelle for Kids (n.d.). http://www. battelleforkids, org/b4k/rt/about/our_work/improve/SOAR. 2011-01-10.
  • 7Value-Added Analysis in Ohio. Battelle for Kids. [EB/OL] http://www.battelleforkids.org. 2005.
  • 8Chester E. Finn,Jr., Terry Ryan, Policy. Emmy L. Parting, Ohio Value-added Primer: a User's Guide. Washington, DC :Thomas B. Fordham institute. 2008,08.
  • 9S. Paul Wright, John T. White, et al. SAS EVAAS Statistical Models [EB/OL]. http://www.sas.com/offces. 2010-03-01.
  • 10Wright, S. P., Sanders, W. L., and Rivers, J. C. Measurement of Academic Growth of Individual Students toward Variable and Meaningful Academic Standards. In: Lissitz, Robert (Ed.). Longitudinal and Value Added Models of Student Performance. Minnesota: JAM Press.2006.385-406.

共引文献543

同被引文献126

引证文献17

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部