期刊文献+

哮喘患儿父母心理弹性现状及影响因素调查 被引量:4

Investigation on the status quo and infl uencing factors of parents’ psychological resilience in children with asthma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的调查分析哮喘患儿父母心理弹性现状,以期为促进患儿父母心理健康,提高其对患儿的照护能力提供参考。方法 2021年1—7月,对医院收治的哮喘患儿父母209名进行调查。调查问卷采用心理弹性量表。结果哮喘患儿父母心理弹性得分为56.35±16.35分。经单因素筛选,多因素线性回归分析显示,患儿母亲的心里弹性水平低,家庭月收入低、哮喘控制水平差、获益感水平低的父母心理弹性较差(P<0.05)。结论护理人员应密切关注疾病控制较差、家庭收入较低以及获益感水平低较低的哮喘患儿父母,尤其关注患儿母亲。 Objective To investigate and analyze the status quo of parents’ psychological resilience in children with asthma, in order to provide reference for promoting parents’ mental health and improving their ability of caring children. Methods From January to July 2021, 209 parents of children with asthma admitted in the hospital were investigated. Psychological Resilience Scale was the questionnaire. Results The score of parents’ mental resilience was 56.35±16.35 points. According to single factor screening and multi-factor linear regression analysis,the low psychological resilience of children’s mother, low monthly income, poor asthma control level and low sense of benefi t was worse(P<0.05). Conclusion Nursing staf f should pay close attention to the parents of asthmatic children with poor disease control, low family income and low sense of benefi t, especially the children’s mother.
作者 王小飞 WANG Xiaofei(Hunan Children's Hospital,Changsha,410000,China)
出处 《护理实践与研究》 2022年第5期658-661,共4页 Nursing Practice and Research
关键词 哮喘 患儿父母 心理弹性 影响因素 Asthma Parents of children Psychological resilience Influencing factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献107

  • 1于肖楠,张建新.自我韧性量表与Connor-Davidson韧性量表的应用比较[J].心理科学,2007,30(5):1169-1171. 被引量:1031
  • 2Lorig KR,Holman H. Self - management education: History, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms [J ]. Ann Behav Med,2003,26 ( 1 ) : 1-7.
  • 3Affleck G,Tennen H. Construing benefits from adversity:Adapto- tional significance and disposltional underpinnings[Jl.Journal of Personality, 1996,64 (4) : 899-922.
  • 4N,Zimmermann T,Huber B,et al. Cancer distress with a couple-based skills training:a randomized trial :J ]. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2012,43 (2) :.
  • 5Weaver KE,Llabre MM,Lechner SC,et al. Comparing unidi- mensional and multi-dimensional models of benefit finding in breast and prostrate cancer I J]. Qual Life Res,2008,17 (5): 771-781.
  • 6American Cancer Society. Cancer treatment and survivorship facts & figures 2014-2015 [ M ]. Atlanta : American Cancer Soci- ety, 2014 : 30.
  • 7Jahn AL,Herman L,Schuster J,et al. Distress and resilience after cancer in veterans[J]. Research in Human Development,2012,9(3) :229-247.
  • 8Beaton DE,Bombardier C,Guillemin F,et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures[J]. Spine ,2000,25 (24) :3186-3191.
  • 9Wild D,Grove A,Martin M,et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for Patient- Reported Outcomes(PRO) measures:report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation [Jl. Value in Health, 2005,8(2) :94-104.
  • 10Tang ST,Dixon J. Instrument translation and evaluation of equivalence and psychometric properties:the Chinese Sense of Coherence Scale[J]. Journal of nursing measurement,2002, 10(1) _.5%76.

共引文献186

同被引文献47

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部