期刊文献+

不同翻转角对3.0T Gd-EOB-DTPA增强胆道系统图像质量影响的研究 被引量:2

Study on the effect of different flip angles on the image quality of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced 3.0T MRI in biliary tract system imaging
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨不同翻转角(FA)对Gd-EOB-DTPA胆道系统成像图像质量的影响。方法:研究纳入31例行Gd-EOBDTPA上腹部MRI增强的患者,采用T1加权三维容积式内插值法屏气检查(VIBE)序列进行扫描,获取FA分别为9°、20°、30°、45°、60°的斜冠状位图像。测量胆道系统各部位(胆囊、左肝管、右肝管、肝总管、胆总管)的信号强度(SI),比较不同FA之间各部位的信噪比(SNR)、对比噪声比(CNR)的差异;采用5分法评价胆道可视性及伪影表现。结果:(1)FA=30°~60°时,胆道各部位图像的SNR均明显高于FA=9°的图像(P<0.05),但FA=30°、45°、60°之间,SNR无统计学差异(P>0.05),左肝管及胆总管SNR在FA=30°时最优,右肝管、肝总管、胆总管及胆囊SNR在FA=45°时最优;(2)FA=30°~60°时胆道各部位图像的CNR均明显高于FA=9°的图像(P<0.05),左肝管、右肝管、肝总管、胆总管图像CNR在FA=30°~60°时均高于FA=20°的图像(P<0.05),左肝管CNR在FA=30°最优,右肝管、肝总管、胆总管及胆囊CNR在FA=45°时最优;(3)FA=30°~60°胆道可视性均高于FA=9°和FA=20°的图像,但FA=60°时伪影增多、图像质量有所下降。结论:Gd-EOB-DTPA增强胆道系统成像中,增大FA(FA=30°~60°)可提高图像SNR及CNR,但FA过大(FA=60°)将导致图像伪影增加,我们推荐在FA=45°作为3T临床扫描延迟成像中Gd-EOB-DTPA增强T1WI肝胆道成像的最佳FA。 Objective:To investigate the effect of different flip angles(FA)on the image quality of Gd-EOB-DTPA biliary tract system imaging.Methods:Thirty-one patients undergoing Gd-EOB-DTPA upper abdominal MRI enhancement were scanned by T1-weighted three-dimensional volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination(VIBE)sequence,and oblique coronal images were obtained with the FA of 9°,20°,30°,45°,and 60°,respectively.The signal intensity(SI)of various parts of the biliary system(gallbladder,left hepatic duct,right hepatic duct,common hepatic duct and common bile duct)was measured,and the differences of signal-to-noise ratio(SNR)and contrast to noise ratio(CNR)between different FA were compared.Biliary tract visibility and artifact appearance were evaluated by 5-point method.Results:(1)When FA=30°~60°,the SNR of each part of biliary tract was significantly higher than that of FA=9°(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference between FA=30°,45°and 60°(P>0.05).The SNRs of left hepatic duct and common bile duct were the best when FA=30°,and SNRs of right hepatic duct,common hepatic duct,common bile duct and gallbladder were the best when FA=45°.(2)When FA=30°~60°,the CNR of each part of biliary duct was significantly higher than that of FA=9°(P<0.05),the CNRs of left hepatic duct,right hepatic duct,common hepatic duct and common bile duct were higher than those of FA=20°(P<0.05).The CNR of left hepatic duct was the best when FA=30°,and the CNRs of right hepatic duct,common hepatic duct,common bile duct and gallbladder were the best when FA=45°.(3)The biliary tract visibility of FA=30°~60°was higher than that of FA=9°and FA=20°images,but the image quality decreased when FA=60°with more artifacts.Conclusion:In Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced biliary tract imaging,increasing the FA(FA=30°~60°)can improve the image SNR and CNR,but too large FA(FA=60°)will lead to the increase of image artifacts.We recommend FA=45°as the optimal FA for Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced T1 WI hepatobiliary imaging at 3 T scanner.
作者 蔡磊 陈国勇 吕琴 熊凡 唐鹤菡 CAI Lei;CHEN Guo-yong;LV Qin;XIONG Fan;TANG He-han(Department of Radiology,West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,China)
出处 《中国临床医学影像杂志》 CAS CSCD 2022年第2期118-121,126,共5页 Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging
关键词 肝疾病 磁共振成像 Liver Diseases Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献59

  • 1Meng-Su Zeng,Hui-Yi Ye,Liang Guo,Wei-Jun Peng,Jian-Ping Lu,Gao-Jun Teng,Josy Breuer,Yi Huan,Ping Li,Jian-Rong Xu,Chang-Hong Liang.Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for focal liver lesions in Chinese patients:a multicenter,open-label,phase Ⅲ study[J].Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International,2013,12(6):607-616. 被引量:40
  • 2Poon RT, Fan ST,Lo CM, et al. Improving survival results after resection of hepatoeellular carcinoma a prospective study of 377 patients over 10 years[J]. Ann Surg,2001,234(1) :63-70.
  • 3Imamura H, Seyama Y,Kokudo N, et al. Single and multiple re sections of multiple hepatic metastases of eolorectal originJ3. Surgery, 2004,135(5) : 508-517.
  • 4Choi SB,Kim KS,Choi JY,et al. The prognosis and survival out come of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma following surgical resec tion:association of lymph node metastasis and lymph node dissec tion with survival[J]. Ann Surg Oneol, 2009,16 (11) : 3048-3056.
  • 5Shoup M,Gonen M, D'Angelica M, et al. Volumetric analysis pre- dicts hepatic dysfunction in patients undergoing major liver resec- tion[J]. J Gastrointest Surg,2003,7(3) :325-330.
  • 6Jarnagin WR,Gonen M,Fong Y,et al. Improvement in periopera- tive outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past deeade[J]. Ann Surg,2002,236(4) :397-406.
  • 7van den Brock MA, Olde Damink SW. laver failure after partial hepatic resection: definition, pathophysiology, risk factors and treatment[J]. Liver Int,2008,28(6) :767-780.
  • 8Imamura H, Seyama Y,Kokudo N, et al. One thousand fifty-six hepatectomies without mortality in 8 years[J]. Arch Surg, 2003, 138(11) : 1198-1206.
  • 9Rohrer M, Bauer H, Mintorovitch J, et al. Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths[J]. Invest Radiol, 2005,40 ( 11 ) 715-724.
  • 10Reimer P, Schneider G, Schima W. Hepatobiliary contrast agents for contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver., properties, clinical devel- opment and applications[J]. Eur Radiol, 2004,14 (4) : 559-578.

共引文献92

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部