期刊文献+

互动沟通模式配合问题导向教学在本科实习护生临床带教中的应用研究 被引量:23

Application of interactive communication mode combined with problem-based learning in clinical teaching of undergraduate nursing students
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨互动沟通模式配合问题导向教学在本科实习护生临床带教中的应用, 为护理教学改革提供依据。方法选择北京积水潭医院本科实习护生62名, 其中2018年9-11月采用传统教学方法的32名纳入对照组, 2019年9—11月采用互动沟通模式配合问题导向教学的30名纳入观察组, 比较2组考核成绩、综合能力、临床沟通能力、科研能力、教学质量反馈情况。结果干预后观察组考核综合成绩为(90.62 ± 4.75)分, 高于对照组的(83.84 ± 5.01)分, 差异有统计学意义(t=5.46, P<0.05);干预后观察组综合能力中观察能力、操作能力、团队协作能力评分分别为(3.51 ± 0.59)、(3.75 ± 0.50)、(4.30 ± 0.77)分, 高于对照组的(3.18 ± 0.44)、(3.22 ± 0.46)、(3.53 ± 0.81)分, 差异有统计学意义(t=2.51、4.35、3.83, 均P<0.05);干预后观察组临床沟通能力中敏锐倾听、明确患者问题、共同参与、传递有效信息、建立和谐医患关系、验证感受评分分别为(83.61 ± 10.18)、(81.66 ± 8.92)、(84.01 ± 9.17)、(83.25 ± 9.73)、(80.90 ± 9.99)、(84.15 ± 8.08)分, 高于对照组的(73.91 ± 9.73)、(74.95 ± 8.05)、(76.02 ± 8.22)、(73.16 ± 8.02)、(74.61 ± 8.54)、(76.08 ± 8.25)分, 差异有统计学意义(t值为2.67 ~ 4.47, 均P<0.05);干预后观察组科研能力中文献查阅能力、资料处理能力、论文写作能力评分分别为(14.29 ± 1.54)、(13.02 ± 1.29)、(14.91 ± 1.50)分, 高于对照组(13.08 ± 1.43)、(11.44 ± 1.24)、(12.36 ± 1.28)分, 差异有统计学意义(t=3.21、4.92、7.22, 均P<0.05);观察组对教学提高护理人文素养、提高职业认同感、提高学习兴趣、提高沟通能力、提高临床思维能力、提高创新能力的反馈评分分别为(4.26 ± 0.75)、(4.43 ± 0.81)、(4.25 ± 0.77)、(4.18 ± 0.66)、(4.44 ± 0.90)、(4.38 ± 0.94)分, 高于对照组的(3.51 ± 0.64)、(3.79 ± 0.70)、(3.48 ± 0.84)、(3.40 ± 0.76)、(3.83 ± 0.89)、(3.60 ± 0.89)分, 差异有统计学意义(t值为2.68 ~ 4.30, 均P<0.05)。结论互动沟通模式配合问题导向教学有效提高了本科实习护生考核成绩, 促进护理本科生综合素质的提升, 有利于护理本科生临床沟通能力、科研能力的提高。 Objective To explore the application of interactive communication mode combined with problem-based learning in clinical teaching of undergraduate nursing students so as to provide basis for nursing teaching reform.Methods A total of 62 undergraduate nursing students in Beijing Jishuitan Hospital were selected.Among them,32 cases from September to November 2018 received traditional teaching(the control group),and 30 cases from September to November 2019 were given interactive communication mode combined with problem-based learning(the observation group).The assessment results,comprehensive ability,clinical communication ability,scientific research ability,and feedback results of teaching quality were compared between the two groups.Results After intervention,the total score of assessment in the observation group was(90.62±4.75)points,higher than that in the control group(83.84±5.01)points,there was significant difference(t=5.46,P<0.05).After intervention,the scores of observation ability,operation ability and teamwork ability in the observation group were(3.51±0.59),(3.75±0.50),(4.30±0.77)points,higher than those in the control group(3.18±0.44),(3.22±0.46),(3.53±0.81)points,there were significant differences(t=2.51,4.35,3.83,all P<0.05).After intervention,the scores of clinical communication and keen listening,determining patients′problems,participating together,sending effective information,establishing harmonious doctor-patient relationship,and verifying perception ability in the observation group were(83.61±10.18),(81.66±8.92),(84.01±9.17),(83.25±9.73),(80.90±9.99),(84.15±8.08)points,higher than those in the control group(73.91±9.73),(74.95±8.05),(76.02±8.22),(73.16±8.02),(74.61±8.54),(76.08±8.25)points,there were significant differences(t values were 2.67-4.47,all P<0.05).After intervention,the scores of literature reading ability,data processing ability and paper writing ability in the observation group were(14.29±1.54),(13.02±1.29),(14.91±1.50)points,higher than those in the control group(13.08±1.43),(11.44±1.24),(12.36±1.28)points,there were significant differences(t=3.21,4.92,7.22,all P<0.05).The feedback scores of students about improving nursing humanistic quality,professional self-identity,learning interest,communication ability,clinical thinking ability and innovation ability in the observation group were(4.26±0.75),(4.43±0.81),(4.25±0.77),(4.18±0.66),(4.44±0.90),(4.38±0.94)points,higher than those in the control group(3.51±0.64),(3.79±0.70),(3.48±0.84),(3.40±0.76),(3.83±0.89),(3.60±0.89)points,there were significant differences(t values were 2.68-4.30,all P<0.05).Conclusions The interactive communication mode combined with problem-based learning can effectively improve assessment results of undergraduate nursing students,and promote the improvement of their comprehensive quality,which is conducive to the improvement of clinical communication ability and scientific research ability in nursing students.
作者 潘锋 宋泽亮 沈杰 Pan Feng;Song Zeliang;Shen Jie(Department of Education,Beijing Jishuitan Hospital,Beijing 100035,China)
出处 《中国实用护理杂志》 2022年第2期140-146,共7页 Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
基金 国家卫计委能力建设和继续教育中心研究课题(2015-A-02-07) 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(13JZD047)。
关键词 本科实习护生 临床带教 互动沟通模式 问题导向教学 Undergraduate nursing student Clinical teaching Interactive communication mode Problem-based learning
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献66

  • 1张剑平.高校教师科研能力评价指标体系设计研究[J].黑龙江高教研究,2006,24(5):101-103. 被引量:35
  • 2侯杰泰.信度与度向性:高alpha量表不一定是单度向[J].教育学报,1995,23(1):135-146.
  • 3叶倩,姜安丽,邓光辉.护理专业大学生护患沟通能力的结构分析及评价工具的初步研究.第二军医大学,2004.
  • 4Steyn M,Borcherds R,van-der-Merwe N.The use of a rating instrument to teach and assess communication skills of health-care workers in a clinic in the Western Cape.Curationis,1999,22(2):32-40.
  • 5Arthur D.Assessing nursing students' basic communication and interviewing skills:the development and testing of a rating scale.J Adv Nurs,1999,29(3):658-665.
  • 6Humphris GM,Kaney S.Assessing the development of communication skills in undergraduate medical students.Medi Educ,2001,35:225-231.
  • 7Kendrick T,Freeling P.A communication skills course for preclinical students:evaluation of general practice based teaching using group methods.Medi Educ,1993,27:211-217.
  • 8Margaret Berman,Branko Cesnik,Merilyn Liddell.Random comparison of 'virtual patient' models in the context of teaching clinical communication skills.Medi Educ,2001,35:824-832.
  • 9Peter Kinderman,Gerry Humphris.Clinical communication skills teaching:the role of cognitive schemata.Medi Educ,1995,29:436-442.
  • 10徐南丽 林碧珠.护理能力量表之建立与评价.肿瘤护理杂志(台),2001,1(2):81-93.

共引文献451

同被引文献248

引证文献23

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部