摘要
缺乏动力因使得技术长期处于哲学视野的边缘。海德格尔将人纳入技术的座架之中,从存在论层面为技术探寻动力因,将技术的本质理解为解蔽。斯蒂格勒认为这种解蔽式的理解看似赋予技术以开显其主体性的动力,实则混淆了动力因与目的因,使技术概念难以得到清晰界定。他结合古希腊神话寓意重新阐发技术的内涵,认为技术与人同源共生,技术是对作为“必要的缺陷”而存在的人之“补余”和“代管”。在建构和完善人的过程中,技术获得本质与动力并展开和实现其自身;在技术对人的语言、知识和记忆进行全面代管的当下及未来,技术意识觉醒孕育着普遍智能革命的契机。技术既是毒药也是解药,技术的超越性、可能性和共通性揭示其非确定性的本质。从这样的立场出发,技术方能成为解放人类的有力武器。
Lacking motivation has made technology on the edge of philosophical vision for a long time. Heidegger brought man into the frame of technology, explored the efficient cause of technology at the ontological level, and recognized the essence of technology as Entbergen. Stiegler believes that it seemingly gives technology the power to show its subjectivity, but it actually confuses the motive and the final cause without a clear definition of technology. He reinterpreted technology by implying ancient Greek mythology,and believes that technology and human beings are homologous and symbiotic, and technology is the “supplement” and “escrow” of human beings as “necessary defects”. When building and perfecting human beings, technology acquires its essence and momentum, and develops itself. As technology is comprehensively manages human language, knowledge and memory, the opportunity of revolution and new human dependence on technology can be brewed and generated. Different from the traditional position of extending the computational essence of technology to certainty, Stiegler points out that the essence of modern technology is precisely of non certainty, which is manifested in transcendence, possibility and commonality. Technology is both a poison and an antidote. From this standpoint, technology can be a powerful weapon for human liberation.
作者
武先云
WU Xian-yun(School of Philosophy,Beijing Normal University,Beijing,100875)
出处
《云南社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第2期41-49,共9页
Social Sciences in Yunnan
