摘要
量化考核的聘任制是我国高等教育领域讨论的重点问题,但一直缺乏严谨的经验研究。聘任制下职称的不同会影响大学教师的学术生产行为。基于中国顶尖大学经济学专业教师数据的实证研究发现,在考核与晋升压力最大的副教授阶段,存在学术产出质量并未处于最高水平的"悖论",大学教师高质量的学术产出主要来自减压效应及其作用机制。量化考核的聘任制扭曲了教师的学术生产行为。给大学教师提供一个宽松的学术环境,对提高大学的学术产出质量具有重要意义。
Since the beginning of this century,there have been fierce debates in the field of Chinese higher education research over the quantity-based professional evaluation system in Chinese universities.Unfortunately there is no empirical evidence to assess either positively or negatively the performance of this reform.This paper tries to provide some empirical evidences on how academic promotion affects academic production at the individual faculty level in Chinese universities in an era of quantity-based evaluation system.We examine how an individual faculty member changes his/her academic output after the adoption of the quantity-based promotion system in his/her three sequential academic positions of lecturer,associate professor,and full professor respectively,with respect to both the quantity and the quality of research publications.We manually collect the individual career and academic output data of 114 professors of economics at 12 top universities who went through three sequential academic positions from lecturer to full professor between the years of 2003 and 2019.For each faculty we construct the quantity and quality indicators using information of the authors’position in the research paper and the impact factor of the journal in which the paper is published.We also manually collect the eligibility information of the quantity-based promotion system in each stage of promotion from each university’s website.We construct the pressure index at the position and university level using the eligibility information of promotion.The lecturers’(associate professors’)pressure index measures the difficulty for them to be promoted to associate professors(full professors respectively)at their university.And we let full professors pressure index be 0.We find that associate professors face the highest promotion pressure.First,for each economist the quality of academic output increases with academic positions.In the stage of associate professor,he/she faces fierce promotion pressure,while the quality of his/her academic output is not at the highest level.After he/she becomes full professor,he/she has the least promotion pressure and produces high-quality papers.Second,the economics professors exhibit no significant difference in the number of academic publications at each stage of their academic position.They always pursue the quantity of publications at each stage.Even in the stage of full professor with minimum pressure,low-quality papers still account for nearly 70%of their publications.With the promotion to the more advanced position,there exists no fundamental change in distortions.These professors of economics pursue the quantity of publication with low quality.The promotion pressure is a crucial reason to distort economists’academic production in Chinese universities.We test this mechanism by introducing the promotion pressure index into the mediating effect model.Empirical evidences show that high-quality academic output mainly comes from the relaxation of the promotion pressure.Professors produce high-quality paper in the low-pressure environment.The environment with high promotion pressure shaped by the quantity-based evaluation system is an important reason of the short-term behavior of academic production in Chinese universities.These empirical findings exhibit very significant policy implications.It is important to relax the promotion pressure and provide a liberal academic environment for academic staff for the improvement of academic research quality in Chinese universities.For this purpose,it is necessary to introduce reforms of the quantity-based evaluation system in Chinese universities.
作者
金祥荣
晁嵩蕾
罗德明
盛沛锋
Jin Xiangrong;Chao Songlei;Luo Deming;Sheng Peifeng(Business School,Ningbo University,Ningbo 315211,China;School of Economics,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China;Center for Research of Private Economy and School of Economics,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China)
出处
《浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第2期128-145,共18页
Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基金
国家自然科学基金面上项目(72073120)
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地基金资助项目(16JJD790052)
浙江省“万人计划”(人文社科领军人才)支持计划(ZJWR0204018)
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“大数据、机器学习与新计量经济学及其应用研究”
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“基于土地资源配置视角的城乡融合发展机制研究”
浙江大学世界顶尖大学合作计划资助项目。
关键词
大学教师
量化考核体系
学术生产
职称晋升
聘任制
晋升压力
university teachers
quantity-based evaluation system
academic production
promotion
recruitment system
promotion pressure
