期刊文献+

商业模式评估、创业型领导驱动战略创业的机制研究 被引量:1

The Driving Mechanism of Business Model Evaluation and Entrepreneurial Leadership on Strategic Entrepreneurship
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于战略创业的行为创新特征,以"情境-认知-行为"框架为基础,通过在该框架中加入影响行为的能力因素,探究商业模式评估、创业型领导与战略创业的关系,并以341家创业企业为样本进行检验。研究表明:商业模式评估的3个维度,即价值提供评估、价值捕获评估、价值架构评估能够为战略创业提供明确的市场方向、平衡的资源结构及高效的外部支撑等信息,推动了战略创业;创业型领导正向调节价值提供评估、价值捕获评估与战略创业的关系,但对价值架构评估与战略创业的关系没有调节作用。 Based on the behavior innovation of strategic entrepreneurship,this study takes “context-cognition-behavior” as a logical framework and explores the relationships between business model evaluation,entrepreneurial leadership and strategic entrepreneurship by adding capability factors into the framework.Further the empirical examine is finished using 341 entrepreneurial firms as samples.The empirical results and robustness analysis show that three dimensions of business model evaluation,i.e.value offer evaluation,value capture evaluation and value architecture evaluation,can provide information on market directions,balanced resource structures and effective external supports for strategic entrepreneurship,and promote strategic entrepreneurship of firms.Entrepreneurial leadership can positively moderate the relationship between value offer evaluation,value capture evaluation and strategic entrepreneurship,but cannot moderate the relationship between value architecture evaluation and strategic entrepreneurship.
作者 刘刚 LIU Gang(East China University of Science and Technology,Shanghai,China)
出处 《管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第3期397-405,共9页 Chinese Journal of Management
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目(17BGL030)。
关键词 战略创业 创业型领导 商业模式评估 机会搜寻 优势搜寻 strategic entrepreneurship entrepreneurial leadership business model evaluation opportunity-seeking advantage-seeking
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献107

  • 1长青,孙宁,张强,张璐.机会窗口、合法性阈值与互联网创业企业战略转型——支付宝2004~2019年纵向案例研究[J].管理学报,2020,17(2):177-185. 被引量:21
  • 2李延喜,杜瑞,高锐,李宁.上市公司投资支出与融资约束敏感性研究[J].管理科学,2007,20(1):82-88. 被引量:49
  • 3Acharya, V. V., Y. Amihud and L. Litov, 2011, "Credi- tor Rights and Corporate Risk-Taking", Journal of Financial Eco- nomics, vol. 102, pp. 150-66.
  • 4Ahneida, H. and M. Campello. 2007, "Financial Con- straints, Asset Tangibility and Corporate Investment", Review of Financial Studies, vol.20, pp. 1429- 1460.
  • 5Armstrong, C. and R. Vashishtha, 2012, "Executive Stock Options, Differential Risk-Taking Incentives and Firm Val- ue", Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 104, pp.70-88.
  • 6Banerjee, S., S. Dasgupta and Y. Kim, 2008, "Buy- er-Supplier Relationships and the Stakeholder Theory of Capital Structure", The Journal of Finance, vol.63, pp.2507-2552.
  • 7Bargeron, L., K. M. Lehn and C. J. ,Zutter, 2010, "Sar- banes-Oxley and Corporate Risk-Taking" ,Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol.49, pp.34-52.
  • 8Bartjargal, B. and M. Liu, 2004, "Entrepreneurs' As- sess to Private Equity in China. The Role of Social Capital", Or- ganization Science, vol. 15 ( 2 ), pp. 159- 172.
  • 9Bauguess, S. W., M. B. Slovin and M. E. Sushka, 2012, "Large Shareholder Diversification, Corporate Risk Taking and the Benefits of Changing to Differential Voting Rights", Journal of Banking and Finance, vol.36, pp. 1244- 125.
  • 10Bekaert, G., C. R. Harvey, L. Christian and S. S. Stephan, 2007, "Global Growth Opportunities and Market Integra- tion", The Journal of Finance, vol.62, pp. 1081 - 1137.

共引文献379

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部