期刊文献+

路桥过渡段软土地基加固沉降对比分析 被引量:17

Comparative Analysis of Settlement for Soft Soil Foundation Reinforcement in the Road and Bridge Transition Section
原文传递
导出
摘要 为比较抗滑桩与CFG桩的加固效果,以某高速公路软土地基路桥过渡段为例,基于FLAC3D模拟计算抗滑桩和CFG桩加固路基填筑后Z方向的地表沉降。台背后20 m范围内的计算结果为:(1)抗滑桩只对其周围土体有加固挤密作用,对距桩体1 m以外的加固作用较弱,分别发生0.62~13.28 cm的沉降;(2)CFG桩加固方案中,桩心距为1.8 m区域的沉降量在2.5 cm以内,桩心距为3.6 m区域沉降量在4 cm以内,在加固区域地基中没有出现土体破坏和生滑动现象,因此采用CFG桩为该桥台的加固方案。对完工的CFG桩进行单桩竖向抗压静载试验与沉降监测,测得台后20 m处桩顶总沉降值为3.89 cm,与数值模拟结果吻合,说明CFG桩可有效减少地基塑性区域、提高地基承载力和降低沉降量。 In order to compare the reinforcement effects of anti-slide piles and CFG piles, taking an expressway soft soil foundation of road and bridge transition as an example, the surface settlement in Z direction after anti-slide piles and CFG piles are simulated and calculated based on FLAC3 D software. The calculation result within 20 m behind the stage is:(1) the anti-slide pile only has a strengthening and compaction effect on part of the soil around the pile, and has a very weak strengthening effect on the soil more than 1 m away from the pile, the vertical displacement is respectively 0.62~13.28 cm at different distances. In the CFG pile reinforcement scheme, the settlement of the area of pile center spacing with a distance of 1.8 m and 3.6 m is respectively within 2.5 cm and 4 cm, there is no soil failure and sliding failure in the foundation of the reinforcement area. Therefore, CFG pile is adopted as the reinforcement scheme in this project. The actual CFG pile was tested for a single pile vertical static load and settlement monitored, the total settlement value of the pile top was 3.89 cm at a distance of 20 m from the abutment, which was anastomosed with the numerical simulation results. The results show that the CFG pile can effectively reduce the plastic zone of the foundation soil, improve the bearing capacity of the foundation and reduce the settlement.
作者 何玉琼 王寿武 肖建宇 李壮 冯子哲 He Yuqiong;Wang Shouwu;Xiao Jianyu;Li Zhuang;Feng Zizhe(Faculy of Transporation Engineering,Kurming Uninersity of Science and Technology,Knming 650500,P.R.China;Cily College,Kunming University of Science and Technology,Kurmning 650051,P.R.China;China Railhocy Delpment and Investment Group Co.,ld.,Kunming 650118,P.R.China)
出处 《地下空间与工程学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2022年第1期313-321,共9页 Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金(41807258) 云南省人才培养基金(KKSY201302135) 云南省教育厅基金(2012Z106)。
关键词 路桥过渡段 软土地基 加固 沉降 对比分析 road-bridge transition soft soil foundation reinforcement sedimentation comparative analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献91

共引文献95

同被引文献120

引证文献17

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部