摘要
目的:探讨研究非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(OPCAB)与体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(CCABG)治疗冠心病患者的效果。方法:将100例冠心病患者根据治疗方法不同分为观察组(n=50,行OPCAB治疗)和对照分组(n=50,行CCABG治疗),比较两组患者治疗效果。结果:观察组手术时间、术后住院时间、术中出血量、24 h引流量和并发症发生率等指标均低于对照组(均P<0.05)。结论:关于冠心病治疗术式选择,采取OPCAB所获疗效优于CCABG,不仅能缩短患者手术时间,减少术中出血量,还能降低并发症发生风险。
Objective:To study the effect of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting(OPCAB)and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting(CCABG)in the treatment of coronary artery disease.Methods:One hundred patients with coronary heart disease were divided into an observation group(n=50,treated with OPCAB)and a control group(n=50,treated with CCABG).Their efficacy was compared between the two groups.Results:The operative time,postoperative hospital stay,intraoperative bleeding volume,24 h drainage volume and the incidence of complications were lower in the observation group than the control group(all P<0.05).Conclusion:OPCAB is more effective than CCABG in the treatment of coronary heart disease and can not only shorten the operation time and lower the bleeding volume,but also reduce the risk of complications.
作者
王刚
WANG Gang(Department of Cardiac Surgery,the Seventh People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou,Zhengzhou 450016,China)
出处
《上海医药》
CAS
2022年第7期51-53,共3页
Shanghai Medical & Pharmaceutical Journal
