期刊文献+

权力感对道德判断的影响及其理论解释:基于CNI模型的视角 被引量:1

The Influence of the Sense of Power on Moral Judgment and Its Theoretical Explanation:Based on the Perspective of the CNI Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 权力感指个体对控制他人和自身的能力的感知。现有权力对道德判断的影响研究主要使用传统两难困境范式,围绕权力感影响主体道德判断的功利论倾向与道义论倾向展开,且研究观点尚未达成共识。由于传统两难困境范式的局限性,研究者开发了道德判断CNI模型探究权力感对道德判断的影响,该模型为两者之间的关系提供了新的解释路径。未来研究可关注CNI模型视角下不同类型权力感对道德判断的影响以及探讨特质性权力感与情境性权力感对个体道德判断差异的联合作用。 The sense of power refers to an individual’s perception of their ability to control others and themselves.The existing research on the influence of power on moral judgment mainly uses the traditional dilemma paradigm,focusing on the utilitarian tendency and deontological tendency of the subject’s moral judgment affected by the sense of power,and the research views have not reached a consensus.Due to the limitations of the traditional dilemma paradigm,the researchers developed the moral judgment CNI model to explore the impact of the sense of power on moral judgment,and this model provides a new way to explain the relationship between the two variables.Future research should focus on the influence of different types of power on moral judgment from the perspective of CNI model and explore the combined effect of idiosyncratic power and situational power on individual moral judgment differences.
作者 袁方舟 叶琴 牟芳艳 七十三 Yuan Fangzhou;Ye Qin;Mu Fangyan;Qi Shisan(School of Psychology,Guizhou Normal University,Guiyang 550025;School of Psychology,Inner Mongolia Normal University,Hohhot 010022)
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第6期540-546,共7页 Psychological Exploration
基金 贵州省2020年度哲学社会科学规划一般课题(20GZYB58)。
关键词 权力感 道德判断 CNI模型 传统两难困境范式 sense of power moral judgment CNI model traditional dilemma paradigm
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献158

  • 1刘传军,廖江群.不幸的道德:运气越差越功利主义[J].中国社会心理学评论,2021(2):222-244. 被引量:3
  • 2苏彦捷,孙芳芳.道德具身性的元分析研究[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2014,32(2):88-96. 被引量:12
  • 3倪伟.我国品德心理研究20年的回顾与反思[J].心理学动态,2001,9(1):52-56. 被引量:13
  • 4韦庆旺.(2008).权力差异和社会动机对谈判行为和结果的影响.博士学位论文.浙江大学.
  • 5Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. L. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1362-1377.
  • 6Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511-536.
  • 7Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462--479.
  • 8Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J. B., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power-sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768-781.
  • 9Berdahl, J. L., & Anderson, C. (2002). Effects of power on emotion and expression during a controversial group discussion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 497-509.
  • 10Carver, C. S., Sutton, $. K., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Action, emotion, and personality: Emerging conceptual integration.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 741-751.

共引文献166

同被引文献9

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部