摘要
自我交易型代理行为包括自己代理与双方代理两种情形。代理权滥用要满足两个构成要件:代理人违反勤勉义务或忠实义务,代理行为损害被代理人利益。自我交易型代理行为并不一定构成代理权滥用,因此,对其效力的认定应区别对待:对于不构成代理权滥用的自我交易行为,法律没有予以特别规制的必要,原则上应承认其代理行为的法律效果;对于构成代理权滥用的自我交易行为,采取可撤销模式更为合理。
There are two kinds of self-dealing agency behavior,self-dealing agency and two-party agency.There are two constitutive requirements for agency abuse,the agent violates the duty of diligence or the duty of loyalty,and the agency bebavior damages the principals’interests.The act of self-exchange agent does not necessarily constitute the abuse of agency right,therefore,the identification of its effectiveness should be treated differently:for the act of self-exchange which does not constitute the abuse of agency right,the law has no need to regulate it specially,in principle,the legal effect of agency should be recognized,and it is preferable to adopt the revocable model for the self-dealing that constitutes the abuse of agency right.
作者
杨善长
YANG Shan-chang(School of Law,Nanjing Audit University,Nanjing Jiangsu,211815,China)
出处
《晋中学院学报》
2022年第2期90-94,共5页
Journal of Jinzhong University
基金
江苏省社会科学基金项目“民事法律行为效力体系研究”(17FXC003)。
关键词
自我交易
代理权滥用
无权代理
效力待定
可撤销
Self-dealing
Abuse of Agency
Unauthorized Agency
Effectiveness to Be Determined
Revocable
