期刊文献+

内镜下黏膜下切除术(EMR改进型)治疗结肠息肉的临床效果分析 被引量:6

Clinical Effect Analysis of Endoscopic Submucosal Resection(Modified EMR) in Treatment of Colonic Polyps
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析黏膜下切除术(EMR改进型)治疗结肠息肉的临床效果。方法:选取肇庆市第一人民医院2018年3月-2020年3月收治的结肠息肉患者60例,依随机数字表法分为研究组和对照组各30例,研究组予以黏膜下切除术(EMR改进型)治疗,对照组单独予以内镜下高频电切术治疗,对比两组治疗效果。结果:研究组浅表隆起结肠息肉治疗总有效率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组亚蒂与有蒂隆起结肠息肉治疗总有效率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组术后并发症总发生率低于对照组,术后生活质量评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:黏膜下切除术(EMR改进型)有助于提升浅表隆起结肠息肉患者的治疗效果,降低并发症,提高生活质量。 Objective: to analyze the clinical effect of submucosal resection(EMR) in the treatment of colonic polyps. Methods: 60patients with colonic polyps treated in Zhaoqing first people’s Hospital from March 2018 to March 2020 were randomly divided into study group and control group, with 30 cases in each group. The study group was treated with submucosal resection(EMR improved type), and the control group was treated with endoscopic high-frequency electroresection alone. The therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared. Results: the total effective rate of the study group was higher than that of the control group(P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups(P > 0.05);The total incidence of postoperative complications in the study group was lower than that in the control group, and the postoperative quality of life score was higher than that in the control group(P < 0.05). Conclusion: submucosal resection(improved EMR) is helpful to improve the treatment effect, reduce complications and improve the quality of life of patients with superficial uplifted colonic polyps.
作者 黄建鑫 张华芬 李明 Huang Jian-xin;Zhang Hua-fen;Li Ming(Department of Gastroenterology,The First People's Hospital of Zhaoqing,Zhaoqing 526020,Guangdong Province,China)
出处 《中国社区医师》 2022年第8期7-9,共3页 Chinese Community Doctors
关键词 内镜下黏膜切除术 内镜下高频电切术 结肠息肉 Endoscopic mucosal resection Endoscopic high-frequency electroresection Colonic polyps
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献114

  • 1结肠癌规范化诊疗指南(试行)[J].慢性病学杂志,2013(7):481-485. 被引量:14
  • 2唐兴俊,陈大勇,邓述勇.内镜下微波治疗食管、胃、结肠息肉68例临床观察[J].临床内科杂志,2004,21(9):620-620. 被引量:1
  • 3刘俊,侯晓华.消化道良性隆起病灶的内镜诊断标准及评价[J].临床消化病杂志,2006,18(3):138-139. 被引量:10
  • 4叶芳,简文杨.《中国结直肠癌诊疗规范2015》正式出台[N].广东科技报,2015-09-29.
  • 5Tanaka S,Saitoh Y,Matsuda T,et al Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps[J].J Gastroenterol,2015,50(3):252-260.
  • 6Anderloni A,Jovani M,Hassan C,et al.Advances,problems,and complications of polypectomy[J].Clin Exp Gastroenterol,2014,7(8):285-296.
  • 7Endoscopic Classification Review Group.Update on the pans classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract[J].Endoscopy,2005,37(6):570-578.
  • 8Williams JG,Pullan RD,Hill J,et al.Management of the malignant colorectal polyp:ACPGBI position statement[J]. Colorectal Dis,2013,15(Suppl 2):S1-S38.
  • 9Glimelius B,Tiret E,Cervantes A,et al.Rectal cancer:ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis,treatment and follow-up[J].Ann Oncol,2013,24(Suppl 6):vi81-vi88.
  • 10Rutter MD,Chattree A,Barbour JA,et al.British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctologists of Great Britain and Ireland guidelines for the management of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps[J].Gut,2015,64(12):1847-1873.

共引文献242

同被引文献55

引证文献6

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部