期刊文献+

围手术期患者口渴不适量表的汉化及信效度检验 被引量:17

The reliability and validity test of the Chinese version of Perioperative Thirst Discomfort Scale
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的汉化英文版围手术期患者口渴不适量表(Perioperative Thirst Discomfort Scale,PTDS),并对其进行跨文化调试及信效度检验。方法严格遵循量表引进原则,对量表进行翻译、回译和跨文化调试。便利选取在福建省4所三级甲等综合医院住院治疗的316例围手术期患者进行调查,验证中文版PTDS的信效度。结果中文版PTDS的Cronbach’sα系数为0.813;量表水平的内容效度指数和条目水平的内容效度指数均为1,共提取2个公因子,即口腔干燥感和口腔异样感,累计方差贡献率为64.312%,量表总分与口渴强度数字评分呈正相关(r=0.681,P<0.001)。结论中文版PTDS具有较好的信效度,可用于科学评估国内围手术期患者的口渴不适程度。 Objective To translate the English version of Perioperative Thirst Discomfort Scale(PTDS)into Chinese,and to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of PTDS.Methods The English version of PTDS was translated into Chinese and back translated and modified for cultural adaptation according to the guidelines.A convenience sample of 316 perioperative patients at 4 tertiary hospitals in Fujian was investigated by the Chinese version of PTDS,in order to test its reliability and validity.Results The Cronbach’sαof the Chinese PTDS was 0.813;both the scale-level content validity index and the item-level content validity index were 1.Factor analysis showed 2 factors explaining 64.312%of the total variance.The score of PTDS was significantly associated with the thirst intensity score(r=0.681,P<0.001).Conclusion The Chinese version of PTDS has been proved to be reliable and valid.It can be used for measuring thirst discomfort in perioperative patients.
作者 黄晨杉 林榕 陈丽丽 陈晓欢 陈美榕 李红 HUANG Chenshan;LIN Rong;CHEN Lili;CHEN Xiaohuan;CHEN Meirong;LI Hong
出处 《中华护理杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2022年第7期892-896,共5页 Chinese Journal of Nursing
关键词 围手术期 口渴不适感 信度 效度 量表 护理 Perioperative Period Thirst Discomfort Reliability Validity Scale Nursing Care
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献74

  • 1柏景坪,林梅.口腔干燥症患者唾液分泌与相关因素分析[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2006,24(3):240-242. 被引量:14
  • 2Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.
  • 3Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135.
  • 4Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575.
  • 5Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22.
  • 6Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293.
  • 7Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385.
  • 8Davis LL.Instrument review:Getting the most from your panel ofexperts[J].Appl Nurs Res,1992,5(4):194–197.
  • 9Polit DF,Beck CT.The content validity index:are you sure youknow what’s being reported?critique and recommendations[J].Res Nurs Health,2006,29(5):489–497.
  • 10Nora JJ.Causes old and new modes,mechanisms and models.Am Heart J,1993,125:1409

共引文献1127

同被引文献223

引证文献17

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部