摘要
目的探讨一般攻击模型框架下挫折情境、归因方式对青少年内隐、外显攻击性的影响机制。方法使用多维-多向归因量表筛选出具有内、外归因倾向的青少年各30名作为研究对象。采用2(有挫折、无挫折)×2(内归因、外归因)混合试验设计,并使用挫折情境任务、Buss-Perry攻击性量表、单类内隐联想测验进行研究。使用E-prime 1.0编写SC-IAT的试验程序,使用SPSS 17.0进行描述性统计、双因素方差分析、简单效应分析以及事后检验。结果挫折情境对个体的外显、内隐攻击性的影响均差异有统计学意义(F(1,58)=6.78,P<0.05,偏η^(2)=0.11和F(1,58)=17.59,P<0.01,偏η^(2)=0.23)。挫折的情境中被试的外显攻击性[(83.43±15.05)分]和内隐攻击性[(-0.06±0.35)分]高于无挫折的情境中的外显攻击性[(80.54±12.40)分]和内隐攻击性[(-0.33±0.49)分]。挫折情境对不同归因方式被试的外显、内隐攻击性的影响均差异有统计学意义(F(1,58)=4.90,P<0.05,偏η^(2)=0.08;F(1,58)=8.68,P<0.01,偏η^(2)=0.13)。挫折情境对内归因被试(D<0)的外显攻击性有较大影响[有挫折:(82.90±12.98)分;无挫折:(77.56±10.16)分],而对外归因被试(D>0)的内隐攻击性有较大影响[有挫折:(0.07±0.35)分;无挫折:(-0.40±0.45)分]。结论挫折情境对青少年的外显、内隐性攻击的影响受到归因方式的调节,一般攻击模型适用于解释外显攻击性和内隐攻击性。
Objective To explore the influence mechanism of frustration situation and attribution style on adolescents'implicit and explicit aggression under the framework of general aggression model.Methods Using the multi-dimensional attribution scale,thirty adolescents with internal attribution and thirty with external attribution tendencies were selected as research objects.A mixed experimental design of 2(frustration vs no frustration)×2(internal attribution vs external attribution)was adopted.And the frustration situation task,Buss-Perry aggressive questionnaire and single category implicit association test were used for the research.The experimental program of SC-IAT was rendered with E-prime 1.0.SPSS 17.0 software was used for descriptive statistics,double facter variance analysis,simple effect analysis and post-test.Results The effects of frustration situation on individuals'explicit and implicit aggression were statistically significant(F(1,58)=6.78,P<0.05,η^(2)=0.11 and F(1,58)=17.59,P<0.01,η^(2)=0.23).The explicit aggression(83.43±15.05)and implicit aggression(-0.06±0.35)in the situation of frustration were higher than those in the condition of no frustration(80.54±12.40)and implicit aggression(-0.33±0.49).The effects of frustration situation on explicit and implicit aggression of subjects with different attribution styles were statistically significant(F(1,58)=4.90,P<0.05,η^(2)=0.08 and F(1,58)=8.68,P<0.01,η^(2)=0.13).The frustration situation had a great influence on explicit aggression of the subjects with internal attribution(D<0)frustration:(82.90±12.98),no frustration:(77.56±10.16),while significant influence was observed on the implicit aggression of the subjects with external attribution(D>0)(frustration:(0.07±0.35),no frustration:(-0.40±0.45)).Conclusion Frustration situation influences explicit and implicit aggression of adolescents,and attribution style plays a moderating role in it.Both explicit aggression and implicit aggression can be explained by the general aggression model.
作者
成秀梅
年彦娜
汪立群
李杰
Cheng Xiumei;Nian Yanna;Wang Liqun;Li Jie(School of Humanities Education,Inner Mongolia Medical University,Hohhot 010059,China;School of Psychology,Inner Mongolia Normal University,Hohhot 010022,China;Party School of the Qianxian Committee of CPC,Xianyang 713300,China)
出处
《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2022年第4期353-358,共6页
Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金
内蒙古自治区高等学校研究项目人文社会科学一般项目(NJSY20031)。
关键词
挫折情境
归因方式
内隐攻击性
外显攻击性
青少年
Frustration situation
Attribution style
Implicit aggression
Explicit aggression
Adolescents
