摘要
目的检验心理弹性量表简化版(10-item Connor-Davidson resilience scale,CD-RISC-10)在我国社区居民中的信效度。方法通过多阶段分层抽样,采用CD-RISC-10、流调中心用抑郁自评量表(the center for epidemiological studies depression scale,CES-D)和凯斯勒心理困扰量表(10-item Kessler psychological distress scale,K10)对2051名社区居民进行问卷调查。采用SPSS 22.0和AMOS 22.0对CD-RISC-10因素结构进行探索性与验证性因素分析;同时采用平行分析与最小平均偏相关方法重测量表因子结构。结果CD-RISC-10的Cronbachα系数为0.94,分半系数为0.89;题总相关系数为0.74~0.81(均P<0.01);探索性因素分析提取了1个公因子,累计方差63.24%;验证性因素分析显示单因素模型的各项拟合指数良好(χ^(2)/df=4.596,CFI=0.967,TLI=0.973,RMSEA=0.065);心理弹性[(27.02±13.50)分]与抑郁[(9.75±5.24)分]、心理困扰[(19.23±6.37)分]均呈显著负相关(r=-0.32,-0.35,均P<0.01)。结论CD-RISC-10具有良好的信效度,使用简易方便,是测量社区居民心理弹性的有效工具。
Objective To explore the reliability and validity of the 10-item Connor-Davidson resilience scale(CD-RISC-10)in Chinese community-dwelling adults.Methods Using multistage stratified sampling,totally 2051 community-dwelling adults were selected and they were investigated by the 10-item Connor-Davidson resilience scale,the center for epidemiological studies depression scale(CES-D)and 10-item Kessler psychological distress scale(K10).The exploratory factor analysis(EFA)and confirmatory factor analysis(CFA)were used to evaluate the CD-RISC-10 by SPSS 22.0 and AMOS 22.0.A parallel analysis and Velicer's minimum average partial(MAP)test were also supplemented to confirm the EFA-derived structure of the scale.Results The Cronbachαcoefficient of the CD-RISC-10 was 0.94,and the Spearman-Brown reliability was 0.89.The total correlation of the questions ranged from 0.74 to 0.81(all P<0.01).The exploratory factor analysis retained its single dimension,which can explain 63.24%of the total variance.Confirmatory factor analysis revealed the single factor model fit data adequately(χ^(2)/df=4.596,CFI=0.967,TLI=0.973,RMSEA=0.065).The resilience(27.02±13.50)was negatively correlated with depression(9.75±5.24)and psychological distress(19.23±6.37)(r=-0.32,-0.35,both P<0.01).Conclusion The CD-RISC-10 scale has acceptable reliability and validity,with using easily and conveniently.Therefore,it is an effective tool for measuring the resilience of the community-dwelling adults.
作者
刘晓华
刘春琴
赵健
李卫峰
李文娟
郑瑞平
Liu Xiaohua;Liu Chunqin;Zhao Jian;Li Weifeng;Li Wenjuan;Zheng Ruiping(Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University,Jinan 250014,China;School of Nursing,Guangzhou Medical University,Guangzhou 510182,China;Department of Medicine,Jinggangshan University,Ji'an 343000,China)
出处
《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2022年第4期366-371,共6页
Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
关键词
心理弹性
社区居民
因子分析
信度
效度
Resilience
Community-dwelling adults
Factor analysis
Reliability
Validity
