期刊文献+

清初“历法之争”再研究——知识、修辞与权力 被引量:1

A revisit to the calendar debate in the early Qing Dynasty:knowledge,rhetoric and power
下载PDF
导出
摘要 清初的“历法之争”被以往的中国科学史描述为一次西方先进天文学对中国落后天文学的辉煌胜利,然而这种辉格史式的断言是远离“历史真相”的。这次历法之争实际上是各方利益集团借助知识与修辞的结合以达到权力目的的复杂事件,根本就不是一次纯粹的科学事件。西方传教士、中国儒家保守人士、回回科天文学家、皇帝在这场斗争中都有着自己的利益诉求。最后,知识、修辞、权力以及各种偶然性因素的搅缠突现出一个谁也没有料想到的结局。 The calendar debate in the early Qing Dynasty has long been considered a victory of advanced astronomy of the West over the outmoded Chinese science and technology.However,this goes against historical facts,for the event was a tussle between different interest groups consisting of western missionaries,Chinese Confucianism conservatives,Arabic astronomers,and the Emperor himself.Surprisingly,a result out of everyone’s expectation emerged out of the crucible of knowledge,rhetoric,power,and chance factors.
作者 周理乾 ZHOU Li-qian
出处 《东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2022年第3期138-145,148,共9页 Journal of Southeast University(Philosophy and Social Science)
基金 国家社会科学基金青年项目“目的语义学及其形式化研究”(18CZX013)成果之一。
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献35

  • 1马克思 恩格斯.《德意志意识形态》[A]..《马克思恩格斯全集》第3卷[C].人民出版社,1960年版.第86页.
  • 2Needham, Joseph, et al. 1969. The Grand Titration. Science and Society in East and West. London : George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
  • 3Gernet, Jacques (1996). History of Chinese Civilization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p.330.
  • 4Needham, Joseph( 1967). The Role of Europe and China in the Evolution of Oecumenical Science, Journal of Asian History, 1.
  • 5Weber, Max (1930/2000). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by Talcott Parsons; Introducion by Anthony Giddens. New York. Routledge.
  • 6Weber, Max (1968). The Religion in China. New York: The Free Press.
  • 7Sivin, Nathan ( 1995). Medicine, Philosophy and Religion in Ancient China. Researches and Reflections. Variorum Collected Studies Series. Aldershot, Hants: Variorum, p.
  • 8Bodde, Derk (1957). Evidence for Laws of Nature in Chinese Thought. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 20:709 - 727.
  • 9Kuhn, Thomas(1962/1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolution, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 10Hessen, Boris (1931). The Social and Economic Roots of Newton's 'Principia' . In: N. Bukharin, ed., Science at the Cross Roadz , London: Frank Cass, pp. 151-212.

共引文献41

同被引文献342

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部