期刊文献+

蒂尔堡孕期困扰量表的汉化及信效度研究 被引量:2

Chinese version of Tilburg Pregnancy Distress Scale and its reliability and validity test
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对蒂尔堡孕期困扰量表(TPDS)进行汉化,并检验其信效度。方法通过翻译、回译、跨文化调适和预试验,形成中文版TPDS,采用便利抽样法,于2019年9月至2020年1月对华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院产科门诊产检的309名孕妇进行问卷调查,评价量表的信效度。结果中文版TPDS各条目的内容效度指数为0.83~1.00,总量表的内容效度为0.91;验证性因子分析显示两因子模型拟合较好,卡方自由度比为1.380,拟合优度指数为0.955,规范拟合指数为0.941,Tucker-Lewis指数为0.977,比较适配指数为0.983,近似残差均方根为0.035;总量表Cronbachα系数为0.834,重测信度为0.826。结论中文版TPDS信效度较好,可用于我国孕期妇女孕期困扰水平的测量。 Objective To translate the Tilburg Pregnancy Distress Scale(TPDS)into Chinese and test its reliability and validity.Methods The Chinese version of TPDS was formed by adopting forward and back translation,cross-cultural semantic equivalence assessment and pilot testing.A questionnaire survey was conducted among 309 pregnant women who were examined in the obstetrical clinic of Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science&Technology from September 2019 to January 2020 by convenience sampling method to test the reliability and validity of questionnaire.Results The content validity of each item ranged from 0.83 to 1.00,while the total table was 0.91.Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the two-factor model fitted well,χ^(2)/df was 1.380,goodness of fit index was 0.955,normal of fit index was 0.941,Tucker-Lewis index was 0.977,comparative fit index was 0.983,root mean square error of approximation was 0.035.The Cronbachαcoefficient of the total scale was 0.834,and the test-retest reliability was 0.826.Conclusions The Chinese version of TPDS has good reliability and validity,and can be used to measure the level of pregnancy distress in Chinese pregnant women.
作者 刘双 刘莉 张怡 曾铁英 闵敏 Liu Shuang;Liu Li;Zhang Yi;Zeng Tieying;Min Min(Department of Obstetrics&Gynecology,Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science&Technology,Wuhan 430030,China;Nursing Department,Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science&Technology,Wuhan 430030,China)
出处 《中国实用护理杂志》 2022年第12期898-902,共5页 Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
基金 国家自然科学基金(71974061)。
关键词 孕妇 孕期困扰 量表 信度 效度 Pregnant women Pregnancy distress Scale Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献57

  • 1李灿,辛玲.调查问卷的信度与效度的评价方法研究[J].中国卫生统计,2008,25(5):541-544. 被引量:476
  • 2焦亚萍,张瑞芳,麦炜碧,林六妹,张慧珠,何桂荷.营养健康教育控制孕妇体重对妊娠过程、妊娠结局的影响[J].现代临床护理,2005,4(1):1-3. 被引量:12
  • 3孔丹莉,张广恩,潘海燕,胡利人,丁元林.糖尿病特异性生存质量量表的信度与效度初探[J].中国慢性病预防与控制,2007,15(3):202-204. 被引量:29
  • 4Denise FP. Essenlials of nursing research:appraising evidence for nursing practice[M]. 7th ed. Philadephia: Wohers Kluwer Lippincott Williams&Wilkins, 2008:372-380.
  • 5Maria D,Rhidian H,Julia M,et al. Translating clinical Iools in nursing practice[J]. J Adv Nurs,2003,44(4) :420-426.
  • 6汪东向,王希林.马弘.心理卫生评定手册(增订版)[M].北京:中同心理卫生杂志社.1999.
  • 7Guillemin F,Bumbardier C,Beaton D. Crosultural adaptation of heahh-re- lated quality of' lifemeasures:literature review and proposed guidelines [J ].Clin Epidemiol, 1993,46(12) : 1417-1432.
  • 8International Council of Nurses(ICN). Translation guidelines lor iolerna- tional classification for nursing practice(ICNP)[M]. Geneva: lmprimerie ' Fornara,2008 : 1-16.
  • 9Huang TY,Moser DK,Hsieh YS,et al. Validation of Chinese version oftilethe Modified pulanhtars Fumctionstl Status and Dyspnea Questionnstinwith heart Litere patietas in Taiwan J .Vn tane ,2008.17.5:436-442.
  • 10Flaherly JA,Gavilia M,Pathak D,et al. Developing instruments for cross- cultural psychiatric research [ J]. J Nerv Ment Dis, 1988,176(20):257- 263.

共引文献786

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部